Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1513887 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: mmdc perf function support i.MX6QP

Started byShawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
First post2016-11-02 15:50 +0100
Last post2016-11-02 16:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: mmdc perf function support i.MX6QP Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-02 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: mmdc perf function support i.MX6QP Zhi Li <lznuaa@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 16:20 +0100

#1513887 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: mmdc perf function support i.MX6QP

FromShawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date2016-11-02 15:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: mmdc perf function support i.MX6QP
Message-ID<sz51v-7yT-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:26:56PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> i.MX6QP added new reigster bit PROFILE_SEL in MADPCR0.
> need set it at perf start.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
> index d82d14c..d833b87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  #define DBG_RST			0x2
>  #define PRF_FRZ			0x4
>  #define CYC_OVF			0x8
> +#define PROFILE_SEL		0x10
>  
>  #define MMDC_MADPCR0	0x410
>  #define MMDC_MADPSR0	0x418
> @@ -55,10 +56,36 @@
>  
>  #define MMDC_NUM_COUNTERS	6
>  
> +#define FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL	0x1
> +
>  #define to_mmdc_pmu(p) container_of(p, struct mmdc_pmu, pmu)
>  
>  static int ddr_type;
>  
> +enum fsl_mmdc_devtype {
> +	FSL_MMDC_IMX6Q,
> +	FSL_MMDC_IMX6QP,
> +};
> +
> +struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data {
> +	enum fsl_mmdc_devtype devtype;
> +	int driver_data;
> +};
> +
> +static struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data imx6q_data = {
> +	.devtype = FSL_MMDC_IMX6Q,
> +};
> +
> +static struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data imx6qp_data = {
> +	.driver_data = FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx_mmdc_dt_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-mmdc", .data = (void *)&imx6q_data},
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-mmdc", .data = (void *)&imx6qp_data},
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDA(mmdc_ida);
> @@ -83,6 +110,7 @@ struct mmdc_pmu {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct perf_event *mmdc_events[MMDC_NUM_COUNTERS];
>  	struct hlist_node node;
> +	struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data *devtype_data;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -307,6 +335,7 @@ static void mmdc_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  	struct mmdc_pmu *pmu_mmdc = to_mmdc_pmu(event->pmu);
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	void __iomem *mmdc_base, *reg;
> +	int val;
>  
>  	mmdc_base = pmu_mmdc->mmdc_base;
>  	reg = mmdc_base + MMDC_MADPCR0;
> @@ -321,7 +350,12 @@ static void mmdc_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0);
>  
>  	writel(DBG_RST, reg);
> -	writel(DBG_EN, reg);
> +
> +	val = DBG_EN;
> +	if (pmu_mmdc->devtype_data->driver_data & FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL)

Shouldn't it be good enough to have the flag telling different
programming model between variants?  That said, I do not see the point
of introducing enum fsl_mmdc_devtype.

Shawn

> +		val |= PROFILE_SEL;
> +
> +	writel(val, reg);
>  }
>  
>  static int mmdc_pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> @@ -436,6 +470,8 @@ static int imx_mmdc_perf_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void __iomem *mmdc_b
>  	char *name;
>  	int mmdc_num;
>  	int ret;
> +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> +		of_match_device(imx_mmdc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
>  
>  	pmu_mmdc = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmu_mmdc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pmu_mmdc) {
> @@ -450,6 +486,8 @@ static int imx_mmdc_perf_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void __iomem *mmdc_b
>  		name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev,
>  				GFP_KERNEL, "mmdc%d", mmdc_num);
>  
> +	pmu_mmdc->devtype_data = (struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data *)of_id->data;
> +
>  	hrtimer_init(&pmu_mmdc->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
>  			HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>  	pmu_mmdc->hrtimer.function = mmdc_pmu_timer_handler;
> @@ -524,11 +562,6 @@ int imx_mmdc_get_ddr_type(void)
>  	return ddr_type;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct of_device_id imx_mmdc_dt_ids[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-mmdc", },
> -	{ /* sentinel */ }
> -};
> -
>  static struct platform_driver imx_mmdc_driver = {
>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "imx-mmdc",
> -- 
> 2.5.2
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1513914

FromZhi Li <lznuaa@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-02 16:20 +0100
Message-ID<sz5ux-7XI-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1513887
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:26:56PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>> i.MX6QP added new reigster bit PROFILE_SEL in MADPCR0.
>> need set it at perf start.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
>> index d82d14c..d833b87 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>  #define DBG_RST                      0x2
>>  #define PRF_FRZ                      0x4
>>  #define CYC_OVF                      0x8
>> +#define PROFILE_SEL          0x10
>>
>>  #define MMDC_MADPCR0 0x410
>>  #define MMDC_MADPSR0 0x418
>> @@ -55,10 +56,36 @@
>>
>>  #define MMDC_NUM_COUNTERS    6
>>
>> +#define FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL   0x1
>> +
>>  #define to_mmdc_pmu(p) container_of(p, struct mmdc_pmu, pmu)
>>
>>  static int ddr_type;
>>
>> +enum fsl_mmdc_devtype {
>> +     FSL_MMDC_IMX6Q,
>> +     FSL_MMDC_IMX6QP,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data {
>> +     enum fsl_mmdc_devtype devtype;
>> +     int driver_data;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data imx6q_data = {
>> +     .devtype = FSL_MMDC_IMX6Q,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data imx6qp_data = {
>> +     .driver_data = FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id imx_mmdc_dt_ids[] = {
>> +     { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-mmdc", .data = (void *)&imx6q_data},
>> +     { .compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-mmdc", .data = (void *)&imx6qp_data},
>> +     { /* sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
>>
>>  static DEFINE_IDA(mmdc_ida);
>> @@ -83,6 +110,7 @@ struct mmdc_pmu {
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       struct perf_event *mmdc_events[MMDC_NUM_COUNTERS];
>>       struct hlist_node node;
>> +     struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data *devtype_data;
>>  };
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -307,6 +335,7 @@ static void mmdc_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>       struct mmdc_pmu *pmu_mmdc = to_mmdc_pmu(event->pmu);
>>       struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>       void __iomem *mmdc_base, *reg;
>> +     int val;
>>
>>       mmdc_base = pmu_mmdc->mmdc_base;
>>       reg = mmdc_base + MMDC_MADPCR0;
>> @@ -321,7 +350,12 @@ static void mmdc_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>       local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0);
>>
>>       writel(DBG_RST, reg);
>> -     writel(DBG_EN, reg);
>> +
>> +     val = DBG_EN;
>> +     if (pmu_mmdc->devtype_data->driver_data & FSL_MMDC_QUIRK_PROFILE_SEL)
>
> Shouldn't it be good enough to have the flag telling different
> programming model between variants?  That said, I do not see the point
> of introducing enum fsl_mmdc_devtype.

Okay, I can remove enum fsl_mmdc_devtype

best regards
Frank Li

>
> Shawn
>
>> +             val |= PROFILE_SEL;
>> +
>> +     writel(val, reg);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int mmdc_pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>> @@ -436,6 +470,8 @@ static int imx_mmdc_perf_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void __iomem *mmdc_b
>>       char *name;
>>       int mmdc_num;
>>       int ret;
>> +     const struct of_device_id *of_id =
>> +             of_match_device(imx_mmdc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
>>
>>       pmu_mmdc = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmu_mmdc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!pmu_mmdc) {
>> @@ -450,6 +486,8 @@ static int imx_mmdc_perf_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void __iomem *mmdc_b
>>               name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev,
>>                               GFP_KERNEL, "mmdc%d", mmdc_num);
>>
>> +     pmu_mmdc->devtype_data = (struct fsl_mmdc_devtype_data *)of_id->data;
>> +
>>       hrtimer_init(&pmu_mmdc->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
>>                       HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>>       pmu_mmdc->hrtimer.function = mmdc_pmu_timer_handler;
>> @@ -524,11 +562,6 @@ int imx_mmdc_get_ddr_type(void)
>>       return ddr_type;
>>  }
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id imx_mmdc_dt_ids[] = {
>> -     { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-mmdc", },
>> -     { /* sentinel */ }
>> -};
>> -
>>  static struct platform_driver imx_mmdc_driver = {
>>       .driver         = {
>>               .name   = "imx-mmdc",
>> --
>> 2.5.2
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web