Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1513861 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-11-02 15:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-11-02 17:40 +0100

#1513861 — [PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning

gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
without a prior initialization:

fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {

As pointed out by Chao Yu, the code is actually correct as 'prealloc'
is only set if the last_ofs_in_node has been set, the two always
get updated together.

This initializes last_ofs_in_node to dn.ofs_in_node for each
new dnode at the start of the 'next_block' loop, which at that
point is a correct initialization as well. I assume that compilers
that correctly track the contents of the variables and do not
warn about the condition also figure out that they can eliminate
the extra assignment here.

Fixes: 46008c6d4232 ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a59ea8e60040..6f01aaddfce9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
 	}
 
 	prealloc = 0;
-	ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
+	last_ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
 	end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
 
 next_block:
-- 
2.9.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1513962

Replaced with this.
Thanks, Arnd & Chao, ;)

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:52:15PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
> without a prior initialization:
> 
> fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
> fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
> 
> As pointed out by Chao Yu, the code is actually correct as 'prealloc'
> is only set if the last_ofs_in_node has been set, the two always
> get updated together.
> 
> This initializes last_ofs_in_node to dn.ofs_in_node for each
> new dnode at the start of the 'next_block' loop, which at that
> point is a correct initialization as well. I assume that compilers
> that correctly track the contents of the variables and do not
> warn about the condition also figure out that they can eliminate
> the extra assignment here.
> 
> Fixes: 46008c6d4232 ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index a59ea8e60040..6f01aaddfce9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
>  	}
>  
>  	prealloc = 0;
> -	ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
> +	last_ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
>  	end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
>  
>  next_block:
> -- 
> 2.9.0

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web