Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1513401 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-01 18:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-04 17:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[GIT PULL] seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-01 18:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4 James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-11-01 23:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-02 03:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4 James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-11-04 17:40 +0100
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-01 18:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [GIT PULL] seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4 |
| Message-ID | <syLma-3gG-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
Please pull these seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4.
Thanks!
-Kees
The following changes since commit 07d9a380680d1c0eb51ef87ff2eab5c994949e69:
Linux 4.9-rc2 (2016-10-23 17:10:14 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git tags/seccomp-v4.9-rc4
for you to fetch changes up to d881d25cf5bc2fafbbfb383a475278977e1bd55a:
samples/seccomp: Support programs with >256 instructions (2016-11-01 08:58:17 -0700)
----------------------------------------------------------------
- fix function prototype documentation
- fix samples to include NNP setting
- fix samples to avoid rule truncation
- fix samples hostprogs variable in Makefile
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mickaël Salaün (1):
seccomp: Fix documentation
Ricky Zhou (3):
samples/seccomp: Fix hostprogs variable
samples/seccomp: Enable PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS in dropper
samples/seccomp: Support programs with >256 instructions
kernel/seccomp.c | 7 +++----
samples/seccomp/Makefile | 4 ++--
samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
samples/seccomp/dropper.c | 7 +++++--
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-01 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <syQ2t-6iF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1513401 |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > Please pull these seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - fix function prototype documentation > - fix samples to include NNP setting > - fix samples to avoid rule truncation > - fix samples hostprogs variable in Makefile > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- These fixes don't seem very critical, and Linus was talking yesterday at KS about too much churn in the -rc series with non-critical fixes. How about we queue this up for 4.10? -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-02 03:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <syTa1-8q9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1513551 |
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:43 PM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please pull these seccomp fixes for v4.9-rc4. > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> - fix function prototype documentation >> - fix samples to include NNP setting >> - fix samples to avoid rule truncation >> - fix samples hostprogs variable in Makefile >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > These fixes don't seem very critical, and Linus was talking yesterday at > KS about too much churn in the -rc series with non-critical fixes. > > How about we queue this up for 4.10? Okay, sounds good to me. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-04 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szPH3-4eu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1513617 |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > > How about we queue this up for 4.10? > > Okay, sounds good to me. Thanks! Pulled to -next. -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web