Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1511490 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-29 02:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-11-02 21:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/3] Remove clocks dependency from SCM driver Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-29 02:10 +0200
[PATCH 3/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Return PTR_ERR when devm_clk_get fails Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-29 02:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-29 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-11-02 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-11-02 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-11-02 21:10 +0100
| From | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-29 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/3] Remove clocks dependency from SCM driver |
| Message-ID | <sxpnI-6UQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On earlier chiptsets (APQ8064, MSM8660, MSM8690, MSM8916, APQ8084, MSM8974) crypto operations of TZ were depends on crypto clocks controlled by users/clients. However on MSM8996 crypto clocks control is handled internally in TZ itself. The current series of patches handle this clock dependency in SCM driver. Sarangdhar Joshi (3): dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add MSM8996 DT bindings firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency firmware: qcom: scm: Return PTR_ERR when devm_clk_get fails .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt | 2 + drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 65 +++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-29 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Return PTR_ERR when devm_clk_get fails |
| Message-ID | <sxpnI-6UQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1511490 |
When devm_clk_get fails for core clock, the failure was ignored
and the core_clk was explicitly set to NULL so that other
remaining clocks can be queried. However, now that we have a
clean way of expressing the clock dependency, return failure when
devm_clk_get fails for core clock.
Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 010a350..5c472da 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -395,10 +395,10 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
-
- scm->core_clk = NULL;
+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "failed to acquire core clk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
}
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-29 02:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency |
| Message-ID | <sxpxo-71f-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1511490 |
Core, iface and bus clocks are not required to be voted from SCM
driver for some of the Qualcomm chipsets. Remove dependency on
these clocks from driver.
Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index d79fecd..010a350 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
#include "qcom_scm.h"
+#define SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK BIT(0)
+#define SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK BIT(1)
+#define SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK BIT(2)
+
struct qcom_scm {
struct device *dev;
struct clk *core_clk;
@@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct qcom_scm *scm;
+ uint64_t clks;
int ret;
scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!scm)
return -ENOMEM;
- scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
- if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
+ clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
+ scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
+ if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
- scm->core_clk = NULL;
+ scm->core_clk = NULL;
+ }
}
if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) {
- scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
- if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to acquire iface clk\n");
- return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk);
+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK) {
+ scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
+ if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) {
+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "failed to acquire iface clk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk);
+ }
}
- scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
- if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to acquire bus clk\n");
- return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk);
+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK) {
+ scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
+ if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) {
+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "failed to acquire bus clk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk);
+ }
}
}
@@ -429,10 +443,23 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_dt_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064",},
- { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660",},
- { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960",},
- { .compatible = "qcom,scm",},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064",
+ .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK,
+ },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660",
+ .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK,
+ },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960",
+ .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK,
+ },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8996",
+ .data = NULL, /* no clocks */
+ },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,scm",
+ .data = (void *) ( SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK
+ | SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK
+ | SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK ),
+ },
{}
};
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-02 00:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency |
| Message-ID | <syQvw-6HK-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1511492 |
On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
> static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct qcom_scm *scm;
> + uint64_t clks;
> int ret;
>
> scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!scm)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
> + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
> + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>
> - scm->core_clk = NULL;
> + scm->core_clk = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) {
Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer
we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device
data to figure out what quirks to apply.
> - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
> - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-02 20:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency |
| Message-ID | <sz9ou-1Xl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1513562 |
On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
>> @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
>> static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct qcom_scm *scm;
>> + uint64_t clks;
>> int ret;
>>
>> scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!scm)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
>> - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>> + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
>> + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
>> + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
>> + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>>
>> - scm->core_clk = NULL;
>> + scm->core_clk = NULL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) {
>
> Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer
> we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device
> data to figure out what quirks to apply.
You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible.
We can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update
it in the same patch?
Regards,
Sarang
>
>> - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
>> - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-02 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency |
| Message-ID | <sza1c-2sn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1514094 |
On Wed 02 Nov 12:24 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> >>@@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
> >> static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> struct qcom_scm *scm;
> >>+ uint64_t clks;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!scm)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >>- scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> >>- if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> >>- if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >>- return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
> >>+ clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> >>+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
> >>+ scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> >>+ if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> >>+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >>+ return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
> >>
> >>- scm->core_clk = NULL;
> >>+ scm->core_clk = NULL;
> >>+ }
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) {
> >
> >Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer
> >we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device
> >data to figure out what quirks to apply.
>
> You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible. We
> can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update it in
> the same patch?
>
Yes, you're replacing the old conditional with a set of new ones, so it
should go in this patch.
Regards,
Bjorn
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web