Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1511847 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler

Started byManuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net>
First post2016-10-29 19:20 +0200
Last post2016-10-29 19:20 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra  scheduler Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net> - 2016-10-29 19:20 +0200

#1511847 — Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler

FromManuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net>
Date2016-10-29 19:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler
Message-ID<sxFst-Z2-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hey, people,
don't you annoy yourselves all the time?
The BFQ patches provide a useful alternative for the code called 
"legacy" by you, while you're not maintaining the base any more, 
and just about to invent something new, again. ?!
When blk-mq has no scheduler -> work on it. When you want to 
develop I/O scheduler APIs -> work on it. Maybe you even want to 
collaborate with someone, who already has a working solution, 
meaning Paolo Valente +team, with BFQ. Too much for you?

I don't see any progress with your blk-mq work since years, while 
Paolo Valente continuously improves and maintains the BFQ.

I need to be a little impolite on here: Several blk maintainers 
behave as masters of the universe, just to keep up their own 
view/ claim. That's a real shame for all Linux.

Best regards,
Manuel Krause

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web