Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1506434 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings

Started byDavid Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
First post2016-10-22 10:50 +0200
Last post2016-10-27 16:10 +0200
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> - 2016-10-22 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during  rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> - 2016-10-24 14:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-24 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during  rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-10-25 11:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during  rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-10-27 16:10 +0200

#1506434 — [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings

FromDavid Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Date2016-10-22 10:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings
Message-ID<sv0a6-15J-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
We found a bug that i2c transfer sometimes failed on 3066a board with
stabel-4.8, the con register would be updated by uninitialized tuning
value, it made the i2c transfer failed.

So give the tuning value to be zero during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings.

Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
index 50702c7..df22066 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
@@ -694,6 +694,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings(unsigned long clk_rate,
 	t_calc->div_low--;
 	t_calc->div_high--;
 
+	/* Give the tuning value 0, that would not update con register */
+	t_calc->tuning = 0;
 	/* Maximum divider supported by hw is 0xffff */
 	if (t_calc->div_low > 0xffff) {
 		t_calc->div_low = 0xffff;
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1507121 — Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings

FromAndy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Date2016-10-24 14:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings
Message-ID<svM54-76Q-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1506434
Hi:


On 2016年10月22日 16:43, David Wu wrote:
> We found a bug that i2c transfer sometimes failed on 3066a board with
> stabel-4.8, the con register would be updated by uninitialized tuning
> value, it made the i2c transfer failed.
>
> So give the tuning value to be zero during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
> index 50702c7..df22066 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
> @@ -694,6 +694,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings(unsigned long clk_rate,
>   	t_calc->div_low--;
>   	t_calc->div_high--;
>   
> +	/* Give the tuning value 0, that would not update con register */
> +	t_calc->tuning = 0;
>   	/* Maximum divider supported by hw is 0xffff */
>   	if (t_calc->div_low > 0xffff) {
>   		t_calc->div_low = 0xffff;

rk3066a based board can't boot up(with endless i2c irq messages print 
out) from linux-4.8 without this fix.

Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1507566

FromDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date2016-10-24 20:40 +0200
Message-ID<svSk9-2XX-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1506434
Hi,

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:43 AM, David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> We found a bug that i2c transfer sometimes failed on 3066a board with
> stabel-4.8, the con register would be updated by uninitialized tuning
> value, it made the i2c transfer failed.
>
> So give the tuning value to be zero during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1508100 — Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-10-25 11:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings
Message-ID<sw63L-3ER-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1506434

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:43:42PM +0800, David Wu wrote:
> We found a bug that i2c transfer sometimes failed on 3066a board with
> stabel-4.8, the con register would be updated by uninitialized tuning
> value, it made the i2c transfer failed.
> 
> So give the tuning value to be zero during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>

Added stable and applied to for-current, thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1510222 — Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-10-27 16:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Give the tuning value 0 during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings
Message-ID<swTxx-2VB-79@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1506434

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:43:42PM +0800, David Wu wrote:
> We found a bug that i2c transfer sometimes failed on 3066a board with
> stabel-4.8, the con register would be updated by uninitialized tuning
> value, it made the i2c transfer failed.
> 
> So give the tuning value to be zero during rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>

What I missed to say in my review:

Please use a subject line that describes WHY the change is needed not so
much WHAT is done. Like: "fix missing initialization causing boot
problems"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web