Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1510252 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-27 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-27 16:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] regmap: Avoid namespace collision within macro Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-10-27 16:20 +0200
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-27 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] regmap: Avoid namespace collision within macro |
| Message-ID | <swTxw-2VB-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:33:19AM +0100, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote:
> #define regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
> ({ \
> - ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> + ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> int ret; \
Why is timeout an issue and not ret?
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web