Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1507699 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-24 22:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-25 01:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> - 2016-10-24 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-10-24 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> - 2016-10-25 01:00 +0200
| From | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-24 22:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches |
| Message-ID | <svUch-4bt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The filesystem level encryption support, currently used by ext4 and f2fs and proposed for ubifs, does not yet have a dedicated mailing list. Since no mailing lists were specified in MAINTAINERS, get_maintainer.pl only recommended to send patches directly to the maintainers and to linux-kernel. This patch adds linux-fsdevel as the preferred mailing list for fscrypto patches for the time being. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index ea4fbc9..d3ce20e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5123,6 +5123,7 @@ F: include/linux/fscache*.h FS-CRYPTO: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT M: Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> M: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> +L: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org S: Supported F: fs/crypto/ F: include/linux/fscrypto.h -- 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-24 22:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches |
| Message-ID | <svUlY-4eX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1507699 |
On 24.10.2016 22:29, Eric Biggers wrote: > The filesystem level encryption support, currently used by ext4 and f2fs > and proposed for ubifs, does not yet have a dedicated mailing list. > Since no mailing lists were specified in MAINTAINERS, get_maintainer.pl > only recommended to send patches directly to the maintainers and to > linux-kernel. This patch adds linux-fsdevel as the preferred mailing > list for fscrypto patches for the time being. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index ea4fbc9..d3ce20e 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -5123,6 +5123,7 @@ F: include/linux/fscache*.h > FS-CRYPTO: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT > M: Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > M: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > +L: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > F: fs/crypto/ > F: include/linux/fscrypto.h That's a very good idea! Do we also have designated git tree for fscrypto? As soon UBIFS file encryption is mainline I'll have to monitor changes to fscrypto very closely because changes in fscrypto could introduce changes in the on-flash format of UBIFS. i.e. a subtle change in filename encryption... :-) Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-25 01:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypto: recommend linux-fsdevel for fscrypto patches |
| Message-ID | <svWnM-5vy-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1507714 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > That's a very good idea! > Do we also have designated git tree for fscrypto? > As soon UBIFS file encryption is mainline I'll have to monitor changes > to fscrypto very closely because changes in fscrypto could introduce > changes in the on-flash format of UBIFS. > i.e. a subtle change in filename encryption... :-) There isn't yet a dedicated fscrypto tree. Ted has been taking in most of my fscrypto patches through the ext4 tree. This was discussed briefly before, but as designed filesystems do not need to be aware of the format of the xattr (fscrypt_context) or the format of the encrypted data per se. Thus, new modes/formats can be introduced without requiring changes to filesystem-specific code. The point that was brought up is whether some filesystems would additionally like to track in their superblock which encryption modes and flags are used and either deny mounts or warn at mount-time if some are unrecognized. So it should be decided soon if UBIFS is going to do that or not. Eric
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web