Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1505303 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-21 00:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-21 02:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-10-21 00:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 00:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 02:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-10-21 02:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 02:50 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 00:30 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree |
| Message-ID | <suu0y-5cv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
I used the version of the net tree from next-20161020 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suujT-5ja-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1505303 |
On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
>
> I used the version of the net tree from next-20161020 for today.
OK, seems like we need an ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, let me fix that.
Thanks Stephen!
--
Florian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suw2l-6sq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1505306 |
On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
>>
>> I used the version of the net tree from next-20161020 for today.
>
> OK, seems like we need an ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, let me fix that.
> Thanks Stephen!
Stephen, can you send me the .config file? I could not reproduce it with
next-20161020 and doing a make multi_v7_defconfig:
fainelli@fainelli-desktop:[~/../linux]$ ls -l drivers/net/dsa/*.ko
-rw-rw-r-- 1 fainelli fainelli 17K Oct 20 17:30 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko
Thanks
--
Florian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suwc1-6vJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1505357 |
Hi Florian,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
> >>
> >> Caused by commit
> >>
> >> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
> >>
> >> I used the version of the net tree from next-20161020 for today.
> >
> > OK, seems like we need an ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, let me fix that.
> > Thanks Stephen!
>
> Stephen, can you send me the .config file? I could not reproduce it with
> next-20161020 and doing a make multi_v7_defconfig:
This only started with the net tree as of today (HEAD a681574c99be).
The problem is simply that kexec_in_progress is not exported to modules.
Sorry, getting the actual .config file is a pain at this point since my
builds have moved on.
It probably had (the current .config has):
CONFIG_NET_DSA_BCM_SF2=m
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
If CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is not set, then kexec_in_progress is defined to false.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suwc1-6vJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1505359 |
On 10/20/2016 05:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>>>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>>>>
>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>
>>>> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
>>>>
>>>> I used the version of the net tree from next-20161020 for today.
>>>
>>> OK, seems like we need an ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, let me fix that.
>>> Thanks Stephen!
>>
>> Stephen, can you send me the .config file? I could not reproduce it with
>> next-20161020 and doing a make multi_v7_defconfig:
>
> This only started with the net tree as of today (HEAD a681574c99be).
> The problem is simply that kexec_in_progress is not exported to modules.
Realized that right after sending you the email.
>
> Sorry, getting the actual .config file is a pain at this point since my
> builds have moved on.
>
> It probably had (the current .config has):
>
> CONFIG_NET_DSA_BCM_SF2=m
> CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
>
> If CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is not set, then kexec_in_progress is defined to false.
Yes indeed, I have a fix ready, thanks!
--
Florian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web