Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1504876 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-10-20 15:20 +0200
    Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic  pinconf functions Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2016-10-20 15:30 +0200

#1504876 — Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:

> This series fixes up generic pinconf support for the sunxi pinctrl driver
> library. The driver was doing some bits wrong, like a) storing the pinconf
> config value in its struct, and not actually reading the hardware to get
> the current config, and b) not using the right arguments for the bias
> parameters.

Looks OK to me, Maxime are you OK with me applying this, or
are we waiting for a new iteration of this patch set?

I have started to apply Maxime's generic binding rework, will it
clash with these?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1504893 — Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic pinconf functions

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:
>
>> This series fixes up generic pinconf support for the sunxi pinctrl driver
>> library. The driver was doing some bits wrong, like a) storing the pinconf
>> config value in its struct, and not actually reading the hardware to get
>> the current config, and b) not using the right arguments for the bias
>> parameters.
>
> Looks OK to me, Maxime are you OK with me applying this, or
> are we waiting for a new iteration of this patch set?
>
> I have started to apply Maxime's generic binding rework, will it
> clash with these?

They will, as my patches also touch the pinconf .get/.set functions.

ChenYu

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web