Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1505514 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and resume ring buffer

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and  resume ring buffer "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and  resume ring buffer "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-10-21 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and  resume ring buffer "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 11:00 +0200

#1505514 — Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and resume ring buffer

Hello Wangnan,

The patch below seems to have landed in Linux 4.7,
commit 86e7972f690c1017fd086cdfe53d8524e68c661c

Could you draft a man-pages patch for this interface
change, please? Or, failing that, a plain-text 
description that we can integrate into the man-page.

Thanks,

Michael

On 03/23/2016 10:33 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016/3/23 17:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:59:41AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> Add new ioctl() to pause/resume ring-buffer output.
>>>
>>> In some situations we want to read from ring buffer only when we
>>> ensure nothing can write to the ring buffer during reading. Without
>>> this patch we have to turn off all events attached to this ring buffer
>>> to achieve this.
>>>
>>> This patch is for supporting overwrite ring buffer. Following
>>> commits will introduce new methods support reading from overwrite ring
>>> buffer. Before reading caller must ensure the ring buffer is frozen, or
>>> the reading is unreliable.
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> index 1afe962..a3c1903 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>>>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER	_IOW('$', 6, char *)
>>>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID		_IOR('$', 7, __u64 *)
>>>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF		_IOW('$', 8, __u32)
>>> +#define PERF_EVENT_IOC_PAUSE_OUTPUT	_IOW('$', 9, __u32)
> 
> Glad to see you start to look at this patchset.
> 
> 
> 
>> Can you also do a patch to the man-pages?
>>
>>    http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/perf_event_open.2.html
> 
> Sure.
> 
> I think I need to provide a patch for:
> 
>   http://git.kernel.org/cgit/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git
> 
> But which one should be the first? Shall we update man pages before
> this patch be merged by upstream? Or Michael and Vince will consider
> this problem?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1505518

On 2016/10/21 15:06, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Wangnan,
>
> The patch below seems to have landed in Linux 4.7,
> commit 86e7972f690c1017fd086cdfe53d8524e68c661c
>
> Could you draft a man-pages patch for this interface
> change, please? Or, failing that, a plain-text
> description that we can integrate into the man-page.

I sent man-pages patches at March:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8678861/
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg10177.html

Let me resend them again.

Thank you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1505587

Hi Wangnan

On 10/21/2016 09:13 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016/10/21 15:06, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hello Wangnan,
>>
>> The patch below seems to have landed in Linux 4.7,
>> commit 86e7972f690c1017fd086cdfe53d8524e68c661c
>>
>> Could you draft a man-pages patch for this interface
>> change, please? Or, failing that, a plain-text
>> description that we can integrate into the man-page.
> 
> I sent man-pages patches at March:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8678861/
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg10177.html
> 
> Let me resend them again.


Ahhh -- my apologies. I found these now.

Cheers,

Michael



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web