Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1503779 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()

Started byThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
First post2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
Last post2016-10-19 17:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to  is_valid_access() Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access() Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2016-10-19 17:20 +0200

#1503779 — Re: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()

FromThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()
Message-ID<su0vw-2D0-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 09/14/16 at 09:23am, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> This fix a pointer leak when an unprivileged eBPF program read a pointer
> value from the context. Even if is_valid_access() returns a pointer
> type, the eBPF verifier replace it with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register
> value containing an address is then allowed to leak. Moreover, this
> prevented unprivileged eBPF programs to use functions with (legitimate)
> pointer arguments.
> 
> This bug was not a problem until now because the only unprivileged eBPF
> program allowed is of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER and all the types
> from its context are UNKNOWN_VALUE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
> Fixes: 969bf05eb3ce ("bpf: direct packet access")
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

Can you post this fix separately? It's valid and needed outside of the
scope of this series.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1503863 — Re: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2016-10-19 17:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC v3 04/22] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()
Message-ID<su0OR-308-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1503779
On 10/19/2016 04:54 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 09/14/16 at 09:23am, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> This fix a pointer leak when an unprivileged eBPF program read a pointer
>> value from the context. Even if is_valid_access() returns a pointer
>> type, the eBPF verifier replace it with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register
>> value containing an address is then allowed to leak. Moreover, this
>> prevented unprivileged eBPF programs to use functions with (legitimate)
>> pointer arguments.
>>
>> This bug was not a problem until now because the only unprivileged eBPF
>> program allowed is of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER and all the types
>> from its context are UNKNOWN_VALUE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
>> Fixes: 969bf05eb3ce ("bpf: direct packet access")
>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>
> Can you post this fix separately? It's valid and needed outside of the
> scope of this series.

Yes, that one was already merged:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1955351da41caa1dbf4139191358fed84909d64b

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web