Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1502791 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 11:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-10-22 19:50 +0200

#1502791 — Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors

Hi Jonathan,

2016-09-03 19:21 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>:
> On 01/09/16 08:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>> Given this dependency I'm assuming the best route for these is via
>>>>>>>> the MFD tree...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lee, shout if you want them to go a different route.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIO looks like a more suitable route.  Please provide me with a
>>>>>>> pull-request base off of an immutable tag.
>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I can tell the precursor patch above hasn't gone in your
>>>>>> tree yet which leaves me unable to take this through IIO for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I'm missing something!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any movement on the dependency above?
>>>>>
>>>>> Last I can find was you adding your ack to it:
>>>>> [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: cros_ec: Add MKBP event support
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/423
>>>>
>>>> Well that's annoying.  Okay, well when I send out the pull-request for
>>>> this one, I will include you.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, better still -- take all of them on one branch and I will
>>>> pull from you.  Saves the toing and froing.
>>>>
>>> Sure. Will probably be the weekend before I get this sorted.
>>
>> No rush.
>>
> Ah, I see you ended up with an immutable branch of this anyway:
> your ib-mfd-input-4.9 branch.
> I'll build an immutable branch on that
> ib-iio-mfd-4.9 in iio.git.
>

Nice, I just saw that the dependencies for this patch series are
already in mainline, thanks.

I don't see the patches in your iio tree, need I to rebase the patch
series on top of mainline and send v5 or you are already taking care
about it?

Cheers,
  Enric.


> Unfortunately I don't have an Ack for patch 4 from Olof yet so
> can't take that and until I do, the rest makes little sense as
> it's not enabled.
>
> Jonathan
>
>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1502807

On 18 October 2016 09:35:06 BST, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>2016-09-03 19:21 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>:
>> On 01/09/16 08:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Given this dependency I'm assuming the best route for these is
>via
>>>>>>>>> the MFD tree...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lee, shout if you want them to go a different route.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IIO looks like a more suitable route.  Please provide me with a
>>>>>>>> pull-request base off of an immutable tag.
>>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell the precursor patch above hasn't gone in
>your
>>>>>>> tree yet which leaves me unable to take this through IIO for
>now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I'm missing something!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any movement on the dependency above?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last I can find was you adding your ack to it:
>>>>>> [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: cros_ec: Add MKBP event support
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/423
>>>>>
>>>>> Well that's annoying.  Okay, well when I send out the pull-request
>for
>>>>> this one, I will include you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, better still -- take all of them on one branch and I
>will
>>>>> pull from you.  Saves the toing and froing.
>>>>>
>>>> Sure. Will probably be the weekend before I get this sorted.
>>>
>>> No rush.
>>>
>> Ah, I see you ended up with an immutable branch of this anyway:
>> your ib-mfd-input-4.9 branch.
>> I'll build an immutable branch on that
>> ib-iio-mfd-4.9 in iio.git.
>>
>
>Nice, I just saw that the dependencies for this patch series are
>already in mainline, thanks.
>
>I don't see the patches in your iio tree, need I to rebase the patch
>series on top of mainline and send v5 or you are already taking care
>about it?
>
>Cheers,
>  Enric.
>
>
>> Unfortunately I don't have an Ack for patch 4 from Olof yet so
>> can't take that and until I do, the rest makes little sense as
>> it's not enabled.
Still looking for an Ack from Olof I think...

Perhaps pm him to get him to take a look.
I doubt much reading is needed but feel free to confirm that!

Jonathan
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1506574

[once more in plain text]


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 October 2016 09:35:06 BST, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>2016-09-03 19:21 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>:
>>> On 01/09/16 08:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Given this dependency I'm assuming the best route for these is
>>via
>>>>>>>>>> the MFD tree...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lee, shout if you want them to go a different route.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIO looks like a more suitable route.  Please provide me with a
>>>>>>>>> pull-request base off of an immutable tag.
>>>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As far as I can tell the precursor patch above hasn't gone in
>>your
>>>>>>>> tree yet which leaves me unable to take this through IIO for
>>now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I'm missing something!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any movement on the dependency above?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Last I can find was you adding your ack to it:
>>>>>>> [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: cros_ec: Add MKBP event support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/423
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's annoying.  Okay, well when I send out the pull-request
>>for
>>>>>> this one, I will include you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, better still -- take all of them on one branch and I
>>will
>>>>>> pull from you.  Saves the toing and froing.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. Will probably be the weekend before I get this sorted.
>>>>
>>>> No rush.
>>>>
>>> Ah, I see you ended up with an immutable branch of this anyway:
>>> your ib-mfd-input-4.9 branch.
>>> I'll build an immutable branch on that
>>> ib-iio-mfd-4.9 in iio.git.
>>>
>>
>>Nice, I just saw that the dependencies for this patch series are
>>already in mainline, thanks.
>>
>>I don't see the patches in your iio tree, need I to rebase the patch
>>series on top of mainline and send v5 or you are already taking care
>>about it?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>  Enric.
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately I don't have an Ack for patch 4 from Olof yet so
>>> can't take that and until I do, the rest makes little sense as
>>> it's not enabled.
> Still looking for an Ack from Olof I think...
>
> Perhaps pm him to get him to take a look.
> I doubt much reading is needed but feel free to confirm that!


Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>


Apologies for the severe delays here. I don't have hardware to test on
for this, so I have to rely on others to vouch for functionality. I
hope to transition maintainership to someone that can pay closer
attention soon.


-Olof

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web