Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1502428 > unrolled thread
| Started by | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-17 22:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-18 10:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH RFC 0/3] x86/fpu: defer FPU state loading until return to userspace riel@redhat.com - 2016-10-17 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86/fpu: defer FPU state loading until return to userspace Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-10-18 10:00 +0200
| From | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 22:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86/fpu: defer FPU state loading until return to userspace |
| Message-ID | <stmy5-8ps-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
These patches defer FPU state loading until return to userspace. This has the advantage of not clobbering the FPU state of one task with that of another, when that other task only stays in kernel mode. It also allows us to skip the FPU restore in kernel_fpu_end(), which will help tasks that do multiple invokations of kernel_fpu_begin/end without returning to userspace, for example KVM VCPU tasks. We could also skip the restore of the KVM VCPU guest FPU state at guest entry time, if it is still valid, but I have not implemented that yet. The code that loads FPU context directly into registers from user space memory, or saves directly to user space memory, is wrapped in a retry loop, that ensures the FPU state is correctly set up at the start, and verifies that it is still valid at the end. I have stress tested these patches with various FPU test programs, and things seem to survive. However, I have not found any good test suites that mix FPU use and signal handlers. Close scrutiny of these patches would be appreciated.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86/fpu: defer FPU state loading until return to userspace |
| Message-ID | <stxtw-7at-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1502428 |
* riel@redhat.com <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > These patches defer FPU state loading until return to userspace. > > This has the advantage of not clobbering the FPU state of one task > with that of another, when that other task only stays in kernel mode. > > It also allows us to skip the FPU restore in kernel_fpu_end(), which > will help tasks that do multiple invokations of kernel_fpu_begin/end > without returning to userspace, for example KVM VCPU tasks. > > We could also skip the restore of the KVM VCPU guest FPU state at > guest entry time, if it is still valid, but I have not implemented > that yet. > > The code that loads FPU context directly into registers from user > space memory, or saves directly to user space memory, is wrapped > in a retry loop, that ensures the FPU state is correctly set up > at the start, and verifies that it is still valid at the end. > > I have stress tested these patches with various FPU test programs, > and things seem to survive. > > However, I have not found any good test suites that mix FPU > use and signal handlers. Close scrutiny of these patches would > be appreciated. BTW., for the next version it would be nice to also have a benchmark that shows the advantages (and proves that it's not causing measurable overhead elsewhere). Either an FPU-aware extension to 'perf bench sched' or a separate 'perf bench fpu' suite would be nice. Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web