Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1502733 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-18 09:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-20 05:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-10-18 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-10-19 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-10-20 05:50 +0200
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 09:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq |
| Message-ID | <stwH7-6TH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes: > This is the initial stage to transfer the pxa25x and pxa27x CPU clocks > handling from cpufreq to the clock API. More precisely, the clocks > transferred are : > - cpll : core pll, known also as the CPU core turbo frequency > - core : core, known also as the CPU actual frequency, being either the > CPU core turbo frequency or the CPU core run frequency > > This transfer is a prequel to shrink the code in pxa2xx-cpufreq.c, so > that it can become, at least in devicetree builds, the casual cpufreq-dt > driver. Hi Michael and Stephen, I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or should I delay the v2 posting ? Cheers. -- Robert
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-19 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq |
| Message-ID | <stMiR-Mt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1502733 |
On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes: > > > This is the initial stage to transfer the pxa25x and pxa27x CPU clocks > > handling from cpufreq to the clock API. More precisely, the clocks > > transferred are : > > - cpll : core pll, known also as the CPU core turbo frequency > > - core : core, known also as the CPU actual frequency, being either the > > CPU core turbo frequency or the CPU core run frequency > > > > This transfer is a prequel to shrink the code in pxa2xx-cpufreq.c, so > > that it can become, at least in devicetree builds, the casual cpufreq-dt > > driver. > > Hi Michael and Stephen, > > I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data > tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. > > If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or > should I delay the v2 posting ? > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. What's blocking that? OPP tables? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-19 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <su5vb-6ae-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1503452 |
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> writes: > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes: >> Hi Michael and Stephen, >> >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. >> >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or >> should I delay the v2 posting ? >> > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > What's blocking that? OPP tables? Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with platform_data" or something else. From what I've seen so far, the missing/blocking points are : - the OPP points definition as you said - probably same thing for the input power supply / regulator - the cooling parts probably - and more generaly all the cpufreq-dt is built around device-tree - last point, the name from KConfig, "Generic DT based cpufreq driver" => that strongly suggest it's device-tree only I'm deeply convinced that Viresh being one of the authors will shed more light on this. Cheers. -- Robert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-19 23:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq |
| Message-ID | <su67T-6o5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1504314 |
On 10/19, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> writes: > > > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes: > >> Hi Michael and Stephen, > >> > >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data > >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. > >> > >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or > >> should I delay the v2 posting ? > >> > > > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > > What's blocking that? OPP tables? > > Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. > To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with > platform_data" or something else. I mean platform_data mostly. Do you use ACPI with the clk driver? > > From what I've seen so far, the missing/blocking points are : > - the OPP points definition as you said Hm.. I thought cpufreq-dt worked with OPP tables populated by other code (i.e. platform code). > - probably same thing for the input power supply / regulator Regulators should be optional I hope. Do you use regulators in your design that has platform_data? > - the cooling parts probably > - and more generaly all the cpufreq-dt is built around device-tree > - last point, the name from KConfig, "Generic DT based cpufreq driver" > => that strongly suggest it's device-tree only > > I'm deeply convinced that Viresh being one of the authors will shed more light > on this. Sure, thanks for the notes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 05:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq |
| Message-ID | <sucwG-25g-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1504338 |
On 19-10-16, 13:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/19, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> writes: > > > > > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes: > > >> Hi Michael and Stephen, > > >> > > >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data > > >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. > > >> > > >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or > > >> should I delay the v2 posting ? > > >> > > > > > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > > > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > > > What's blocking that? OPP tables? > > > > Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. > > To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with > > platform_data" or something else. > > I mean platform_data mostly. Do you use ACPI with the clk driver? I would like to see sample code for that, as I am not sure what all changes would be required in cpufreq-dt in that case. Yes it is more dependent on the OPP framework than DT right now. My first impression is that it should be doable.. -- viresh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web