Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1501238 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] logfs: remove from tree

Started byAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
First post2016-10-15 02:40 +0200
Last post2016-10-24 08:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] logfs: remove from tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-10-15 02:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] logfs: remove from tree Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-10-24 08:40 +0200

#1501238 — Re: [PATCH] logfs: remove from tree

FromAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date2016-10-15 02:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] logfs: remove from tree
Message-ID<sslb3-cb-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:04:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Logfs was introduced to the kernel in 2009, and hasn't seen any non
> drive-by changes since 2012, while having lots of unsolved issues
> including the complete lack of error handling, with more and more
> issues popping up without any fixes.
> 
> The logfs.org domain has been bouncing from a mail, and the maintainer
> on the non-logfs.org domain hasn't repsonded to past queries either.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX  |    2 -
>  Documentation/filesystems/logfs.txt |  241 ----
>  MAINTAINERS                         |    8 -
>  fs/Kconfig                          |    1 -
>  fs/Makefile                         |    1 -
[snip]

IMO that's a plain and simple "just before -rc1" fodder, to be sent
straight to Linus.  No objections from me, anyway.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1506932

FromChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date2016-10-24 08:40 +0200
Message-ID<svH5o-3Tr-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1501238
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:33:29AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> IMO that's a plain and simple "just before -rc1" fodder, to be sent
> straight to Linus.  No objections from me, anyway.

It's "just after -rc2" now, but maybe it's still time for this
trivial removal?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web