Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1499335 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-12 05:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-12 21:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH V2] cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-10-12 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-10-12 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-12 21:30 +0200
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2] cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency |
| Message-ID | <sriff-74U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Skip invalid entries when searching the frequency. This fixes cpufreq
at least on loongson2 MIPS board.
Fixes: da0c6dc00c69 ("cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently")
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V1->V2:
- Use cpufreq_frequency_table() instead.
Hi Aaro,
Can you please test this patch instead?
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 631ba33bbe9f..5fa55fc56e18 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -639,19 +639,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_al(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq >= target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find lowest freq at or above target in a table in descending order */
@@ -659,28 +659,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - pos;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
@@ -700,28 +700,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in descending order */
@@ -729,19 +729,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq <= target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
@@ -761,32 +761,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
- if (target_freq - table[best].frequency > freq - target_freq)
- return i;
+ if (target_freq - best->frequency > freq - target_freq)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find closest freq to target in a table in descending order */
@@ -794,32 +794,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
- if (table[best].frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
- return i;
+ if (best->frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 20:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency |
| Message-ID | <srwLf-8fi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1499335 |
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:45:05AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
>
> Skip invalid entries when searching the frequency. This fixes cpufreq
> at least on loongson2 MIPS board.
>
> Fixes: da0c6dc00c69 ("cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently")
> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> V1->V2:
> - Use cpufreq_frequency_table() instead.
>
> Hi Aaro,
>
> Can you please test this patch instead?
Seems to work as well.
Thanks,
A.
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 631ba33bbe9f..5fa55fc56e18 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -639,19 +639,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_al(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq >= target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> /* Find lowest freq at or above target in a table in descending order */
> @@ -659,28 +659,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq == target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> if (freq > target_freq) {
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> continue;
> }
>
> /* No freq found above target_freq */
> - if (best == -1)
> - return i;
> + if (best == table - 1)
> + return pos - table;
>
> - return best;
> + return best - pos;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - pos;
> }
>
> /* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
> @@ -700,28 +700,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq == target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> if (freq < target_freq) {
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> continue;
> }
>
> /* No freq found below target_freq */
> - if (best == -1)
> - return i;
> + if (best == table - 1)
> + return pos - table;
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> /* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in descending order */
> @@ -729,19 +729,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq <= target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> /* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
> @@ -761,32 +761,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq == target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> if (freq < target_freq) {
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> continue;
> }
>
> /* No freq found below target_freq */
> - if (best == -1)
> - return i;
> + if (best == table - 1)
> + return pos - table;
>
> /* Choose the closest freq */
> - if (target_freq - table[best].frequency > freq - target_freq)
> - return i;
> + if (target_freq - best->frequency > freq - target_freq)
> + return pos - table;
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> /* Find closest freq to target in a table in descending order */
> @@ -794,32 +794,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
> unsigned int freq;
> - int i, best = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
> - freq = table[i].frequency;
> + cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> + freq = pos->frequency;
>
> if (freq == target_freq)
> - return i;
> + return pos - table;
>
> if (freq > target_freq) {
> - best = i;
> + best = pos;
> continue;
> }
>
> /* No freq found above target_freq */
> - if (best == -1)
> - return i;
> + if (best == table - 1)
> + return pos - table;
>
> /* Choose the closest freq */
> - if (table[best].frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
> - return i;
> + if (best->frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
> + return pos - table;
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> - return best;
> + return best - table;
> }
>
> /* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
> --
> 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-12 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <srxnY-ke-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1499884 |
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 09:33:03 PM Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:45:05AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
> >
> > Skip invalid entries when searching the frequency. This fixes cpufreq
> > at least on loongson2 MIPS board.
> >
> > Fixes: da0c6dc00c69 ("cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently")
> > Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > V1->V2:
> > - Use cpufreq_frequency_table() instead.
> >
> > Hi Aaro,
> >
> > Can you please test this patch instead?
>
> Seems to work as well.
I'm going to apply this patch then.
Thanks,
Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web