Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1499975 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc

Started byJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
First post2016-10-13 01:30 +0200
Last post2016-10-13 19:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-10-13 01:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2016-10-13 12:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-10-13 19:20 +0200

#1499975 — [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc

FromJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date2016-10-13 01:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc
Message-ID<srB8d-30B-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
This patch fixes using a wrong pointer for sum_page in f2fs_gc.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/gc.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index e48142f..9c18917 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -854,16 +854,16 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 
 	for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
 
-		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
-					unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
-			goto next;
-
 		/* find segment summary of victim */
 		sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
 					GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
-		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !PageUptodate(sum_page));
 		f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
 
+		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
+				!PageUptodate(sum_page) ||
+				unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+			goto next;
+
 		sum = page_address(sum_page);
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, type != GET_SUM_TYPE((&sum->footer)));
 
-- 
2.8.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1500148

FromChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date2016-10-13 12:40 +0200
Message-ID<srLAC-2i4-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1499975
Hi Jaegeuk,

On 2016/10/13 7:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch fixes using a wrong pointer for sum_page in f2fs_gc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index e48142f..9c18917 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -854,16 +854,16 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  	for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
>  
> -		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> -					unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> -			goto next;
> -
>  		/* find segment summary of victim */
>  		sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
>  					GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
> -		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !PageUptodate(sum_page));
>  		f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
>  
> +		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> +				!PageUptodate(sum_page) ||

Why uptodate flag of summary page can be cleared? someone truncates it?

Thanks,

> +				unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> +			goto next;
> +
>  		sum = page_address(sum_page);
>  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, type != GET_SUM_TYPE((&sum->footer)));
>  
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1500467

FromJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date2016-10-13 19:20 +0200
Message-ID<srRPH-6uS-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1500148
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:33:19PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> On 2016/10/13 7:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch fixes using a wrong pointer for sum_page in f2fs_gc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index e48142f..9c18917 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -854,16 +854,16 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  
> >  	for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
> >  
> > -		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> > -					unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > -			goto next;
> > -
> >  		/* find segment summary of victim */
> >  		sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> >  					GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
> > -		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !PageUptodate(sum_page));
> >  		f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
> >  
> > +		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> > +				!PageUptodate(sum_page) ||
> 
> Why uptodate flag of summary page can be cleared? someone truncates it?

Well, it looks like no problem to remove this, since it will hit
f2fs_cp_error(). I just intended to handle the above f2fs_bug_on here.

I found you added the above bug_on, but it's not a big deal to remain tho. :)

718e53fa: f2fs: enhance foreground GC

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > +				unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > +			goto next;
> > +
> >  		sum = page_address(sum_page);
> >  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, type != GET_SUM_TYPE((&sum->footer)));
> >  
> > 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web