Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1494808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-03 12:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-07 15:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-10-03 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2016-10-04 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-10-07 15:10 +0200
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings |
| Message-ID | <so8Fs-3GE-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, even though we still support the old one. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is not set, its actual value will be unspecified. +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration +bindings. + +*** Deprecated pin configuration and multiplexing binding + Required subnode-properties: - allwinner,pins: List of strings containing the pin name. -- git-series 0.8.10
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-04 04:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sonO9-4Mz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1494808 |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > even though we still support the old one. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > +bindings. Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all. ChenYu > + > +*** Deprecated pin configuration and multiplexing binding > + > Required subnode-properties: > > - allwinner,pins: List of strings containing the pin name. > -- > git-series 0.8.10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 15:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings |
| Message-ID | <spD4t-QQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1495151 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > > +bindings. > > Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all. Yep, I'll add that. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web