Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1496144 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-10-06 04:50 +0200
Last post2016-10-06 05:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-10-06 04:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the  percpu tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-10-06 05:00 +0200

#1496144 — linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-10-06 04:50 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu tree
Message-ID<sp6UV-2mL-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  mm/percpu.c

between commits:

  93c76b6b2faa ("mm/percpu.c: correct max_distance calculation for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")
  9b7396624a7b ("mm/percpu.c: fix potential memory leakage for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")

from the percpu tree and commit:

  567f646230a5 ("mm/percpu.c: correct max_distance calculation for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")

from the akpm-current tree.

There is one small differenve between 567f646230a5 and 9b7396624a7b and
then further changes in 93c76b6b2faa.

I fixed it up (using the percpu tree version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1496146 — Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-10-06 05:00 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the percpu tree
Message-ID<sp74B-2qb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1496144
Hi all,

On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 13:43:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   mm/percpu.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   93c76b6b2faa ("mm/percpu.c: correct max_distance calculation for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")
>   9b7396624a7b ("mm/percpu.c: fix potential memory leakage for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")
> 
> from the percpu tree and commit:
> 
>   567f646230a5 ("mm/percpu.c: correct max_distance calculation for pcpu_embed_first_chunk()")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> There is one small differenve between 567f646230a5 and 9b7396624a7b and
> then further changes in 93c76b6b2faa.

Cut an paste error.  Should have said:

There is one small difference between 567f646230a5 and 93c76b6b2faa and
then further changes in 9b7396624a7b.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web