Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1494841 > unrolled thread

0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re: [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'le16')

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re:  [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139  1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list  before 'le16') Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-10-03 13:30 +0200
    Re: 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re:  [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139  1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list  before 'le16') Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2016-10-03 16:00 +0200

#1494841 — 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re: [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'le16')

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi!

> tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
> head:   596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
> commit: 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de [1/1] hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores
> config: openrisc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: or32-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.1-or32-1.0rc1
> reproduce:
>         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         git checkout 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make.cross ARCH=openrisc 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

I get it, it does not compile anywhere, because I made a mistake. Ok?

But I know now, and if it does not compile on x86, there's very very
little chance that it would compile on openrisc.

Can we stop the announcements after first or second failure?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1494886

Hi Pavel,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
>> head:   596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
>> commit: 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de [1/1] hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores
>> config: openrisc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: or32-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.1-or32-1.0rc1
>> reproduce:
>>         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>         git checkout 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>         make.cross ARCH=openrisc
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>I get it, it does not compile anywhere, because I made a mistake. Ok?
>
>But I know now, and if it does not compile on x86, there's very very
>little chance that it would compile on openrisc.
>
>Can we stop the announcements after first or second failure?

Sorry for the extra noises!

The build bot will stop complaining after 3 reports on the same
commit. Shall I further reduce the threshold to 1 or 2? It'll risk
hiding real different/independent errors though.

Thanks,
Fengguang

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web