Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1495815 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand

Started byArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
First post2016-10-05 13:30 +0200
Last post2016-10-10 15:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with  target as second operand Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-10-05 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with  target as second operand Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-10 15:40 +0200

#1495815 — Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand

FromArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date2016-10-05 13:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand
Message-ID<soSyB-iX-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Em Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:17:54PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> Current perf is not able to parse jump instruction when second operand
> contains target address. Arch like powerpc has such instructions. For
> example, 'bne  cr7,0xc0000000000f6154'.
> 
> objdump o/p:
>   c0000000000f6140:   ld     r9,1032(r31)
>   c0000000000f6144:   cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>   c0000000000f6148:   bne    cr7,0xc0000000000f6154
>   c0000000000f614c:   ld     r9,2312(r30)
>   c0000000000f6150:   std    r9,1032(r31)
>   c0000000000f6154:   ld     r9,88(r31)

So the above is what is parsed to generate the following? Or these
aren't related?
 
> Before patch:
>          ld     r9,1032(r31)
>          cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>       v  bne    3ffffffffff09f2c
>          ld     r9,2312(r30)
>          std    r9,1032(r31)
>   74:    ld     r9,88(r31)
> 
> After patch:
>          ld     r9,1032(r31)
>          cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>       v  bne    74
>          ld     r9,2312(r30)
>          std    r9,1032(r31)
>   74:    ld     r9,88(r31)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v7:
>   - Added example in description
> 
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 1ccf26a..a9dbac1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -122,8 +122,12 @@ bool ins__is_call(const struct ins *ins)
>  static int jump__parse(struct ins_operands *ops, struct map *map __maybe_unused)
>  {
>  	const char *s = strchr(ops->raw, '+');
> +	const char *c = strchr(ops->raw, ',');
>  
> -	ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, NULL, 16);
> +	if (c++ != NULL)
> +		ops->target.addr = strtoull(c, NULL, 16);
> +	else
> +		ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, NULL, 16);
>  
>  	if (s++ != NULL)
>  		ops->target.offset = strtoull(s, NULL, 16);
> -- 
> 2.5.5

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1498323

FromRavi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-10-10 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<sqIYa-1PF-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1495815

On Wednesday 05 October 2016 04:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:17:54PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>> Current perf is not able to parse jump instruction when second operand
>> contains target address. Arch like powerpc has such instructions. For
>> example, 'bne  cr7,0xc0000000000f6154'.
>>
>> objdump o/p:
>>   c0000000000f6140:   ld     r9,1032(r31)
>>   c0000000000f6144:   cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>>   c0000000000f6148:   bne    cr7,0xc0000000000f6154
>>   c0000000000f614c:   ld     r9,2312(r30)
>>   c0000000000f6150:   std    r9,1032(r31)
>>   c0000000000f6154:   ld     r9,88(r31)
> So the above is what is parsed to generate the following? Or these
> aren't related?

Yes, following is the perf annotate o/p from above objdump o/p.

-Ravi

>
>> Before patch:
>>          ld     r9,1032(r31)
>>          cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>>       v  bne    3ffffffffff09f2c
>>          ld     r9,2312(r30)
>>          std    r9,1032(r31)
>>   74:    ld     r9,88(r31)
>>
>> After patch:
>>          ld     r9,1032(r31)
>>          cmpdi  cr7,r9,0
>>       v  bne    74
>>          ld     r9,2312(r30)
>>          std    r9,1032(r31)
>>   74:    ld     r9,88(r31)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v7:
>>   - Added example in description
>>
>>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> index 1ccf26a..a9dbac1 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> @@ -122,8 +122,12 @@ bool ins__is_call(const struct ins *ins)
>>  static int jump__parse(struct ins_operands *ops, struct map *map __maybe_unused)
>>  {
>>  	const char *s = strchr(ops->raw, '+');
>> +	const char *c = strchr(ops->raw, ',');
>>  
>> -	ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, NULL, 16);
>> +	if (c++ != NULL)
>> +		ops->target.addr = strtoull(c, NULL, 16);
>> +	else
>> +		ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, NULL, 16);
>>  
>>  	if (s++ != NULL)
>>  		ops->target.offset = strtoull(s, NULL, 16);
>> -- 
>> 2.5.5

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web