Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1495514 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] x86/pkeys: Update documentation

Started byDave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
First post2016-10-04 18:40 +0200
Last post2016-10-05 10:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] x86/pkeys: Update documentation Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2016-10-04 18:40 +0200
    [tip:mm/pkeys] x86/pkeys: Update documentation tip-bot for Dave Hansen <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-10-05 10:50 +0200

#1495514 — [PATCH] x86/pkeys: Update documentation

FromDave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Date2016-10-04 18:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH] x86/pkeys: Update documentation
Message-ID<soAV4-5f3-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>

There are a few items that have gotten stale in the protection
keys documentation.  The config option description only applied
to the execute-only support and is not accurate for the current
code.  There was also a typo with the number of system calls.  I
also wanted to call out that pkey_set() is not a kernel-provided
facility, and where to find an implementation.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
---

 b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt |   14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt~pkeys-docfix Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
--- a/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt~pkeys-docfix	2016-10-04 09:31:01.361928429 -0700
+++ b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt	2016-10-04 09:32:39.142383585 -0700
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ instruction fetches.
 
 =========================== Syscalls ===========================
 
-There are 2 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
+There are 3 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
 
 	int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights)
 	int pkey_free(int pkey);
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ is no longer in use:
 	munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE);
 	pkey_free(pkey);
 
+(Note: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions.
+ An example implementation can be found in
+ tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c)
+
 =========================== Behavior ===========================
 
 The kernel attempts to make protection keys consistent with the
@@ -79,11 +83,3 @@ with a read():
 The kernel will send a SIGSEGV in both cases, but si_code will be set
 to SEGV_PKERR when violating protection keys versus SEGV_ACCERR when
 the plain mprotect() permissions are violated.
-
-=========================== Config Option ===========================
-
-This config option adds approximately 1.5kb of text. and 50 bytes of
-data to the executable.  A workload which does large O_DIRECT reads
-of holes in XFS files was run to exercise get_user_pages_fast().  No
-performance delta was observed with the config option
-enabled or disabled.
_

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1495759 — [tip:mm/pkeys] x86/pkeys: Update documentation

Fromtip-bot for Dave Hansen <tipbot@zytor.com>
Date2016-10-05 10:50 +0200
Subject[tip:mm/pkeys] x86/pkeys: Update documentation
Message-ID<soQ3L-6QO-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1495514
Commit-ID:  6679dac513fd612f34d3a3d99d7b84ed6d5eb5cc
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/6679dac513fd612f34d3a3d99d7b84ed6d5eb5cc
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:38:57 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:34:55 +0200

x86/pkeys: Update documentation

There are a few items that have gotten stale in the protection
keys documentation.  The config option description only applied
to the execute-only support and is not accurate for the current
code.  There was also a typo with the number of system calls.  I
also wanted to call out that pkey_set() is not a kernel-provided
facility, and where to find an implementation.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161004163857.71E0D6F6@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

---
 Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
index 6da7689..b643045 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
+++ b/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ instruction fetches.
 
 =========================== Syscalls ===========================
 
-There are 2 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
+There are 3 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
 
 	int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights)
 	int pkey_free(int pkey);
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ is no longer in use:
 	munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE);
 	pkey_free(pkey);
 
+(Note: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions.
+ An example implementation can be found in
+ tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c)
+
 =========================== Behavior ===========================
 
 The kernel attempts to make protection keys consistent with the
@@ -79,11 +83,3 @@ with a read():
 The kernel will send a SIGSEGV in both cases, but si_code will be set
 to SEGV_PKERR when violating protection keys versus SEGV_ACCERR when
 the plain mprotect() permissions are violated.
-
-=========================== Config Option ===========================
-
-This config option adds approximately 1.5kb of text. and 50 bytes of
-data to the executable.  A workload which does large O_DIRECT reads
-of holes in XFS files was run to exercise get_user_pages_fast().  No
-performance delta was observed with the config option
-enabled or disabled.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web