Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1493479 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-29 16:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-29 17:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/6] ipr: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-29 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/6] ipr: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-09-29 17:40 +0200
| From | Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 16:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/6] ipr: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors |
| Message-ID | <smKca-56w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Thanks Christoph. Very nice. As I was reviewing the patch, I noticed the additional PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY flag, which is currently not being set in this patch. Is the intention to set that globally by default, or should I follow up with a one liner to add that to the ipr driver in the next patch set I send out? Acked-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <smLBf-5S3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1493479 |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:01:44AM -0500, Brian King wrote: > Thanks Christoph. Very nice. As I was reviewing the patch, I noticed > the additional PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY flag, which is currently not being set > in this patch. Is the intention to set that globally by default, or > should I follow up with a one liner to add that to the ipr driver > in the next patch set I send out? Hi Brian, PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY seems useful for ipr, especially if you also increase the number of vectors above the current default 2. And yes, please make it a separate patch.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web