Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1493160 > unrolled thread

[PATCH -v4 00/10] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during swapping out

Started by"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
First post2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
Last post2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH -v4 00/10] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during swapping out "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
    [PATCH -v4 6/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to add/delete THP to/from swap cache "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
    [PATCH -v4 5/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to clear SWAP_HAS_CACHE for huge page "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-09-29 08:40 +0200

#1493160 — [PATCH -v4 00/10] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during swapping out

From"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH -v4 00/10] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during swapping out
Message-ID<smDaF-rc-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

This patchset is to optimize the performance of Transparent Huge Page
(THP) swap.

Hi, Andrew, could you help me to check whether the overall design is
reasonable?

Hi, Hugh, Shaohua, Minchan and Rik, could you help me to review the
swap part of the patchset?  Especially [01/10], [04/10], [05/10],
[06/10], [07/10], [10/10].

Hi, Andrea and Kirill, could you help me to review the THP part of the
patchset?  Especially [02/10], [03/10], [09/10] and [10/10].

Hi, Johannes, Michal and Vladimir, I am not very confident about the
memory cgroup part, especially [02/10] and [03/10].  Could you help me
to review it?

And for all, Any comment is welcome!


Recently, the performance of the storage devices improved so fast that
we cannot saturate the disk bandwidth when do page swap out even on a
high-end server machine.  Because the performance of the storage
device improved faster than that of CPU.  And it seems that the trend
will not change in the near future.  On the other hand, the THP
becomes more and more popular because of increased memory size.  So it
becomes necessary to optimize THP swap performance.

The advantages of the THP swap support include:

- Batch the swap operations for the THP to reduce lock
  acquiring/releasing, including allocating/freeing the swap space,
  adding/deleting to/from the swap cache, and writing/reading the swap
  space, etc.  This will help improve the performance of the THP swap.

- The THP swap space read/write will be 2M sequential IO.  It is
  particularly helpful for the swap read, which are usually 4k random
  IO.  This will improve the performance of the THP swap too.

- It will help the memory fragmentation, especially when the THP is
  heavily used by the applications.  The 2M continuous pages will be
  free up after THP swapping out.

- It will improve the THP utilization on the system with the swap
  turned on.  Because the speed for khugepaged to collapse the normal
  pages into the THP is quite slow.  After the THP is split during the
  swapping out, it will take quite long time for the normal pages to
  collapse back into the THP after being swapped in.  The high THP
  utilization helps the efficiency of the page based memory management
  too.


This patchset is based on 9/20 head of mmotm/master.

This patchset is the first step for the THP swap support.  The plan is
to delay splitting THP step by step, finally avoid splitting THP
during the THP swapping out and swap out/in the THP as a whole.

As the first step, in this patchset, the splitting huge page is
delayed from almost the first step of swapping out to after allocating
the swap space for the THP and adding the THP into the swap cache.
This will reduce lock acquiring/releasing for the locks used for the
swap cache management.

With the patchset, the swap out throughput improves 12.1% (from about
1.12GB/s to about 1.25GB/s) in the vm-scalability swap-w-seq test case
with 16 processes.  The test is done on a Xeon E5 v3 system.  The swap
device used is a RAM simulated PMEM (persistent memory) device.  To
test the sequential swapping out, the test case uses 16 processes,
which sequentially allocate and write to the anonymous pages until the
RAM and part of the swap device is used up.

The detailed compare result is as follow,

base             base+patchset
---------------- -------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
   1118821 ±  0%     +12.1%    1254241 ±  1%  vmstat.swap.so
   2460636 ±  1%     +10.6%    2720983 ±  1%  vm-scalability.throughput
    308.79 ±  1%      -7.9%     284.53 ±  1%  vm-scalability.time.elapsed_time
      1639 ±  4%    +232.3%       5446 ±  1%  meminfo.SwapCached
      0.70 ±  3%      +8.7%       0.77 ±  5%  perf-stat.ipc
      9.82 ±  8%     -31.6%       6.72 ±  2%  perf-profile.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irq.__add_to_swap_cache.add_to_swap_cache.add_to_swap.shrink_page_list


From the swap out throughput number, we can find, even tested on a RAM
simulated PMEM (Persistent Memory) device, the swap out throughput can
reach only about 1.1GB/s.  While, in the file IO test, the sequential
write throughput of an Intel P3700 SSD can reach about 1.8GB/s
steadily.  And according the following URL,

https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/intel-ssd-dc-family-for-pcie.html

The sequential write throughput of Intel P3608 SSD can reach about
3.0GB/s, while the random read IOPS can reach about 850k.  It is clear
that the bottleneck has moved from the disk to the kernel swap
component itself.

The improved storage device performance should have made the swap
becomes a better feature than before with better performance.  But
because of the issues of kernel swap component itself, the swap
performance is still kept at the low level.  That prevents the swap
feature to be used by more users.  And this in turn causes few kernel
developers think it is necessary to optimize kernel swap component.
To break the loop, we need to optimize the performance of kernel swap
component.  Optimize the THP swap performance is part of it.


Changelog:

v4:

- Per Johannes' comments, simplified swap cgroup array accessing code.
- Per Kirill and Dave Hansen's comments, used HPAGE_PMD_NR instead of
  HPAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE.
- Per Anshuman's comments, used HPAGE_PMD_NR instead of 512 in patch
  description.

v3:

- Per Andrew's suggestion, used a more systematical way to determine
  whether to enable THP swap optimization
- Per Andrew's comments, moved as much as possible code into
  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGE_PAGE/#endif or "if (PageTransHuge())"
- Fixed some coding style warning.

v2:

- Original [1/11] sent separately and merged
- Use switch in 10/10 per Hiff's suggestion

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1493162 — [PATCH -v4 6/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to add/delete THP to/from swap cache

From"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH -v4 6/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to add/delete THP to/from swap cache
Message-ID<smDaG-rc-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1493160
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

With this patch, a THP (Transparent Huge Page) can be added/deleted
to/from the swap cache as a set of (HPAGE_PMD_NR) sub-pages.

This will be used for the THP (Transparent Huge Page) swap support.
Where one THP may be added/delted to/from the swap cache.  This will
batch the swap cache operations to reduce the lock acquire/release times
for the THP swap too.

Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/page-flags.h |  2 +-
 mm/swap_state.c            | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index 74e4dda..f5bcbea 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HighMem)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
-PAGEFLAG(SwapCache, swapcache, PF_NO_COMPOUND)
+PAGEFLAG(SwapCache, swapcache, PF_NO_TAIL)
 #else
 PAGEFLAG_FALSE(SwapCache)
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index d3f047b..3115762 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct address_space swapper_spaces[MAX_SWAPFILES] = {
 };
 
 #define INC_CACHE_INFO(x)	do { swap_cache_info.x++; } while (0)
+#define ADD_CACHE_INFO(x, nr)	do { swap_cache_info.x += (nr); } while (0)
 
 static struct {
 	unsigned long add_total;
@@ -80,25 +81,33 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
  */
 int __add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
 {
-	int error;
+	int error, i, nr = hpage_nr_pages(page);
 	struct address_space *address_space;
+	struct page *cur_page;
+	swp_entry_t cur_entry;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapBacked(page), page);
 
-	get_page(page);
+	page_ref_add(page, nr);
 	SetPageSwapCache(page);
-	set_page_private(page, entry.val);
 
 	address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
+	cur_page = page;
+	cur_entry.val = entry.val;
 	spin_lock_irq(&address_space->tree_lock);
-	error = radix_tree_insert(&address_space->page_tree,
-				  swp_offset(entry), page);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, cur_page++, cur_entry.val++) {
+		set_page_private(cur_page, cur_entry.val);
+		error = radix_tree_insert(&address_space->page_tree,
+					  swp_offset(cur_entry), cur_page);
+		if (unlikely(error))
+			break;
+	}
 	if (likely(!error)) {
-		address_space->nrpages++;
-		__inc_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_PAGES);
-		INC_CACHE_INFO(add_total);
+		address_space->nrpages += nr;
+		__mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_FILE_PAGES, nr);
+		ADD_CACHE_INFO(add_total, nr);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&address_space->tree_lock);
 
@@ -109,9 +118,16 @@ int __add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
 		 * So add_to_swap_cache() doesn't returns -EEXIST.
 		 */
 		VM_BUG_ON(error == -EEXIST);
-		set_page_private(page, 0UL);
 		ClearPageSwapCache(page);
-		put_page(page);
+		set_page_private(cur_page, 0UL);
+		while (i--) {
+			cur_page--;
+			cur_entry.val--;
+			set_page_private(cur_page, 0UL);
+			radix_tree_delete(&address_space->page_tree,
+					  swp_offset(cur_entry));
+		}
+		page_ref_sub(page, nr);
 	}
 
 	return error;
@@ -122,7 +138,7 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	int error;
 
-	error = radix_tree_maybe_preload(gfp_mask);
+	error = radix_tree_maybe_preload_order(gfp_mask, compound_order(page));
 	if (!error) {
 		error = __add_to_swap_cache(page, entry);
 		radix_tree_preload_end();
@@ -138,6 +154,7 @@ void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct page *page)
 {
 	swp_entry_t entry;
 	struct address_space *address_space;
+	int i, nr = hpage_nr_pages(page);
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapCache(page), page);
@@ -145,12 +162,17 @@ void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct page *page)
 
 	entry.val = page_private(page);
 	address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
-	radix_tree_delete(&address_space->page_tree, swp_offset(entry));
-	set_page_private(page, 0);
 	ClearPageSwapCache(page);
-	address_space->nrpages--;
-	__dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_PAGES);
-	INC_CACHE_INFO(del_total);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, entry.val++) {
+		struct page *cur_page = page + i;
+
+		radix_tree_delete(&address_space->page_tree,
+				  swp_offset(entry));
+		set_page_private(cur_page, 0);
+	}
+	address_space->nrpages -= nr;
+	__mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_FILE_PAGES, -nr);
+	ADD_CACHE_INFO(del_total, nr);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -227,8 +249,8 @@ void delete_from_swap_cache(struct page *page)
 	__delete_from_swap_cache(page);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&address_space->tree_lock);
 
-	swapcache_free(entry);
-	put_page(page);
+	__swapcache_free(entry, PageTransHuge(page));
+	page_ref_sub(page, hpage_nr_pages(page));
 }
 
 /* 
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1493163 — [PATCH -v4 5/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to clear SWAP_HAS_CACHE for huge page

From"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2016-09-29 08:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH -v4 5/9] mm, THP, swap: Support to clear SWAP_HAS_CACHE for huge page
Message-ID<smDaG-rc-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1493160
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

__swapcache_free() is added to support to clear the SWAP_HAS_CACHE flag
for the huge page.  This will free the specified swap cluster now.
Because now this function will be called only in the error path to free
the swap cluster just allocated.  So the corresponding swap_map[i] ==
SWAP_HAS_CACHE, that is, the swap count is 0.  This makes the
implementation simpler than that of the ordinary swap entry.

This will be used for delaying splitting THP (Transparent Huge Page)
during swapping out.  Where for one THP to swap out, we will allocate a
swap cluster, add the THP into the swap cache, then split the THP.  If
anything fails after allocating the swap cluster and before splitting
the THP successfully, the swapcache_free_trans_huge() will be used to
free the swap space allocated.

Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/swap.h |  9 +++++++--
 mm/swapfile.c        | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index b83d36d..e303ad9 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ extern void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swapcache_prepare(swp_entry_t);
 extern void swap_free(swp_entry_t);
-extern void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t);
+extern void __swapcache_free(swp_entry_t, bool);
 extern int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swap_type_of(dev_t, sector_t, struct block_device **);
 extern unsigned int count_swap_pages(int, int);
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static inline void swap_free(swp_entry_t swp)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t swp)
+static inline void __swapcache_free(swp_entry_t swp, bool huge)
 {
 }
 
@@ -551,6 +551,11 @@ static inline swp_entry_t get_huge_swap_page(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
 
+static inline void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+	__swapcache_free(entry, false);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 static inline int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 8224150..126c789 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -732,6 +732,27 @@ static void swap_free_huge_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
 	__swap_entry_free(si, offset, true);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Caller should hold si->lock.
+ */
+static void swapcache_free_trans_huge(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+				      swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+	unsigned long offset = swp_offset(entry);
+	unsigned long idx = offset / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
+	unsigned char *map;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	map = si->swap_map + offset;
+	for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++) {
+		VM_BUG_ON(map[i] != SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
+		map[i] &= ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
+	}
+	/* Cluster size is same as huge page size */
+	mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(entry, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
+	swap_free_huge_cluster(si, idx);
+}
+
 static unsigned long swap_alloc_huge_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si)
 {
 	unsigned long idx;
@@ -758,6 +779,11 @@ static inline unsigned long swap_alloc_huge_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static inline void swapcache_free_trans_huge(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+					     swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 swp_entry_t __get_swap_page(bool huge)
@@ -949,13 +975,16 @@ void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
 /*
  * Called after dropping swapcache to decrease refcnt to swap entries.
  */
-void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
+void __swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry, bool huge)
 {
 	struct swap_info_struct *p;
 
 	p = swap_info_get(entry);
 	if (p) {
-		swap_entry_free(p, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
+		if (unlikely(huge))
+			swapcache_free_trans_huge(p, entry);
+		else
+			swap_entry_free(p, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
 		spin_unlock(&p->lock);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web