Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1487289 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists

Started byMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
First post2016-09-20 14:40 +0200
Last post2016-09-22 20:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-20 14:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT  table exists Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-09-22 20:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT  table exists Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-09-22 20:30 +0200

#1487289 — [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists

FromMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-09-20 14:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
Message-ID<sjsv8-2Y6-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the
native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog
implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been
validated by OEMs

Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
index 5ef9b733d153..26298af73232 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
@@ -1486,7 +1486,9 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		priv->features |= FEATURE_IRQ;
 		priv->features |= FEATURE_SMBUS_PEC;
 		priv->features |= FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER;
-		priv->features |= FEATURE_TCO;
+		/* If we have ACPI based watchdog use that instead */
+		if (!acpi_has_watchdog())
+			priv->features |= FEATURE_TCO;
 		priv->features |= FEATURE_HOST_NOTIFY;
 		break;
 
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1489259 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-09-22 20:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
Message-ID<skgrW-10r-99@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1487289

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:30:53PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the
> native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog
> implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been
> validated by OEMs
> 
> Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

BTW I assume this patch does not go via the i2c tree. Please tell me if
you think otherwise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1489314 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-09-22 20:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
Message-ID<skgUX-1qI-59@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1487289

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:30:53PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the
> native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog
> implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been
> validated by OEMs
> 
> Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web