Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1487537 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-20 19:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-21 21:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] ima: fix off-by-one comparison on template name length Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-09-20 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ima: fix off-by-one comparison on template name length Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-21 21:20 +0200
| From | Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] ima: fix off-by-one comparison on template name length |
| Message-ID | <sjx1M-5Yj-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The comparison of dr_v1->template_name_len is off-by-one, so
currently if the length is MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN we end up
with an out-of-bounds write on template_name when the terminating
zero character is written. Fix the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
index 24775f3..004723c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ int ima_restore_measurement_list(loff_t size, void *buf)
hdr_v1->template_name_len =
le32_to_cpu(hdr_v1->template_name_len);
- if ((hdr_v1->template_name_len > MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN) ||
+ if ((hdr_v1->template_name_len >= MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN) ||
((bufp + hdr_v1->template_name_len) > bufendp)) {
pr_err("attempting to restore a template name \
that is too long\n");
--
2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjVdL-4yb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1487537 |
Hi Colin,
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 18:25 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The comparison of dr_v1->template_name_len is off-by-one, so
> currently if the length is MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN we end up
> with an out-of-bounds write on template_name when the terminating
> zero character is written. Fix the comparison.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Thank you for the bug report. The patch that introduces this bug is in
the -mm tree. The next posting will include this bug fix.
Thanks!
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
> index 24775f3..004723c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ int ima_restore_measurement_list(loff_t size, void *buf)
> hdr_v1->template_name_len =
> le32_to_cpu(hdr_v1->template_name_len);
>
> - if ((hdr_v1->template_name_len > MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN) ||
> + if ((hdr_v1->template_name_len >= MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN) ||
> ((bufp + hdr_v1->template_name_len) > bufendp)) {
> pr_err("attempting to restore a template name \
> that is too long\n");
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web