Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1487311 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-20 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-21 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: iTCO_wdt watchdog on Asus P10S-WS motherboard FREEZES MOTHERBOARD COMPLETELY Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-20 15:00 +0200
Re: iTCO_wdt watchdog on Asus P10S-WS motherboard FREEZES MOTHERBOARD COMPLETELY David Madore <david+ml@madore.org> - 2016-09-21 14:20 +0200
Re: iTCO_wdt watchdog on Asus P10S-WS motherboard FREEZES MOTHERBOARD COMPLETELY Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> - 2016-09-21 15:30 +0200
| From | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: iTCO_wdt watchdog on Asus P10S-WS motherboard FREEZES MOTHERBOARD COMPLETELY |
| Message-ID | <sjsOu-34H-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:01:09PM +0200, David Madore wrote: > TL;DR: the iTCO_wdt watchdog on the Asus P10S-WS motherboard, instead > of rebooting the machine, places the motherboard in a completely > nonfunctional state, from which it can be revived only by a hard power > cycle. I suspect this is a BIOS bug: seeking advice on how/where to > report this, and what to do generally. Maybe Linux can work around? > > > Dear list, > > I have an Asus P10S-WS motherboard (Intel C236 chipset). I have been > trying to get the iTCO_wdt hardware watchdog to work (I have been > successfully using this driver with similar Intel chipset based Asus > motherboards before, and I know it to work reliably). I am using > Linux 4.7.3. > > I trigger a reboot by killing (with kill -9) the wd_keepalive daemon > once it has opened the watchdog device. > > Sadly, it appears that on this motherboard, the watchdog does not > reboot the machine (or at least, does not successfully reboot it). > Instead, the machine enters a "frozen" state (fans spinning, screen > black, all peripherals unresponsive) from which it cannot be woken up > by pressing the reset button, or even the power button twice (the > first press does turn the machine off, but it returns to the same > nonfunctional state after power on). Instead, power has to be cut > completely, at the power supply level. > > In this nonfunctional state, the Asus POST status display shows the > number "62", which according to the motherboard manual is the code for > "installation of the PCH runtime services" (I have no idea of what > that means). > > I suspect that this is a BIOS ^W UEFI bug and in no way Linux's fault. > It could also be a hardware problem, a chipset bug, or something else. > And even if it is a firmware bug, it is conceivable that there is a > way to work around the problem from Linux. So I ask for guidance from > the wisdom of this list: > > * Is there something Linux can do about the problem? > > * Is there a chance some kernel developer knows someone at Asus and > can bring this problem to their attention? > > * Can someone report success using the iTCO_wdt watchdog with other > motherboards having the same Intel C236 chipset? (Note: for it to > work, the i2c_smbus module needs to be loaded: it took me a long > time to figure out.) > > * Is all hope lost for my motherboard? (I badly need a hardware > watchdog: if there is no way to get it to work on this motherboard, > I will need to buy a new one.) > > Any suggestions are welcome (or even words of comfort :-). Does the machine have WDAT ACPI table (see /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/*)? If it does, you can try the new WDAT watchdog driver instead [1]. It still uses the same hardware, though but via set of instructions provided by the BIOS that should work (given the vendor has tested it on Windows). [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1230607.html
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Madore <david+ml@madore.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjOFj-sk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1487311 |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Does the machine have WDAT ACPI table (see /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/*)?
> If it does, you can try the new WDAT watchdog driver instead [1]. It
> still uses the same hardware, though but via set of instructions
> provided by the BIOS that should work (given the vendor has tested
> it on Windows).
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1230607.html
Thanks for pointing this out. My motherboard's BIOS does not have
this ACPI table, unfortunately, but it's at least good to know that
some do, and take the hardware watchdog seriously.
--
David A. Madore
( http://www.madore.org/~david/ )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjPL4-146-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1488071 |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, David Madore wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Does the machine have WDAT ACPI table (see /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/*)? > > If it does, you can try the new WDAT watchdog driver instead [1]. It > > still uses the same hardware, though but via set of instructions > > provided by the BIOS that should work (given the vendor has tested > > it on Windows). > > > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1230607.html > > Thanks for pointing this out. My motherboard's BIOS does not have > this ACPI table, unfortunately, but it's at least good to know that > some do, and take the hardware watchdog seriously. The ones that take the hardware watchdog seriously will command the power supply to do a power cycle when it triggers, which pretty much cuts power to everything that is not hanging off the +5VSB (standby power) line. Let's just say that SSDs don't like it, at all. Avoid at *all* *costs*. I have been using the kernel's software watchdog on most systems because of that: it just soft-reboots, which is good enough almost every time and doesn't mess with the SSDs. The proper fix is to have two levels of watchdogs, a soft reboot on time T for the first level, and a power cycle on time 5T (to give the BIOS enough of a time window to reset the second level watchdog during a soft reboot). -- Henrique Holschuh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web