Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1482872 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-14 04:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-14 07:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-09-14 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-09-14 07:50 +0200
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 04:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format |
| Message-ID | <sh7Et-1Iy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support >> > > > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and >> > > > it's not that bad ;-) >> > > >> > > Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes. >> > >> > sure >> > >> > so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further? >> >> If the split version is acceptable it's fine for me to merge it. >> >> I'll add split-json to my scripting, so the next update would >> be split too. > > ook, I'll wait for patches then Who are you waiting for patches from? Would be great if this could go in for 4.9 still. cheers
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 07:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format |
| Message-ID | <shbf3-54i-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1482872 |
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support > >> > > > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and > >> > > > it's not that bad ;-) > >> > > > >> > > Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes. > >> > > >> > sure > >> > > >> > so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further? > >> > >> If the split version is acceptable it's fine for me to merge it. > >> > >> I'll add split-json to my scripting, so the next update would > >> be split too. > > > > ook, I'll wait for patches then > > Who are you waiting for patches from? > > Would be great if this could go in for 4.9 still. No objections from me - the latest bits were good: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web