Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1484175 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-15 15:40 +0200

#1484175 — [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter

Right now, the kernel address filters in PT are prone to integer overflow
that may happen in adding filter's size to its offset to obtain the end
of the range. Such an overflow would also throw a #GP in the PT event
configuration path.

Fix this by explicitly validating the result of this calculation.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
index 5ec0100e3f..834ce06b00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -1084,8 +1084,13 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validate(struct list_head *filters)
 		if (!filter->range || !filter->size)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-		if (!filter->inode && !kernel_ip(filter->offset))
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (!filter->inode) {
+			if (!kernel_ip(filter->offset))
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			if (!kernel_ip(filter->offset + filter->size))
+				return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
 		if (++range > pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web