Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1481117 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

Started byYT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
First post2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
Last post2016-09-13 07:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com> - 2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> - 2016-09-13 07:40 +0200

#1481117 — Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

FromYT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
Date2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701
Message-ID<sgwvg-1VB-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi CK,

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:37 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, YT:
> 
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> 
> [snip...]
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > index 4b4e449..465819b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp_match {
> >  
> >  static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL]	= { MTK_DISP_AAL,	0, NULL },
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS]	= { MTK_DISP_PWM,	0, NULL },
> 
> I think BLS is different than PWM, so this statement should be
> 
> [DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL };
The BLS module actually is a multifunction device, one of them is the
PWM function.  We only upstream PWM function [1] now, and it is
accepted.  When there are real use case (gamma function), we will update
this part.  What do you think?

Regards,
yt.shen

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/

> 
> 
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	0, &ddp_color },
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	1, &ddp_color },
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0]	= { MTK_DPI,		0, NULL },
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1482144

FromCK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Date2016-09-13 07:40 +0200
Message-ID<sgOBP-5N0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1481117
Hi, YT:

On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:16 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> Hi CK,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:37 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, YT:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > [snip...]
> > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > index 4b4e449..465819b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp_match {
> > >  
> > >  static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL]	= { MTK_DISP_AAL,	0, NULL },
> > > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS]	= { MTK_DISP_PWM,	0, NULL },
> > 
> > I think BLS is different than PWM, so this statement should be
> > 
> > [DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL };
> The BLS module actually is a multifunction device, one of them is the
> PWM function.  We only upstream PWM function [1] now, and it is
> accepted.  When there are real use case (gamma function), we will update
> this part.  What do you think?

I think BLS = PWM + GAMMA and the device with register range from
0x1400a000 to 0x1400afff should be called BLS. I think this device is
called PWM in [1] because it just use its PWM function and it's not
suitable. At least in DRM driver, we should use the term BLS rather than
PWM. Maybe we should define as below:

[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL };

and

{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm",   .data = (void
*)MTK_DISP_BLS },


Regards,
CK

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/

> 
> Regards,
> yt.shen
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/
> 
> > 
> > 
> > >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	0, &ddp_color },
> > >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	1, &ddp_color },
> > >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0]	= { MTK_DPI,		0, NULL },
> > 
> > Regards,
> > CK
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web