Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1481947 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-12 22:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-13 16:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: amlogic: Add spifc support to Amlogic's GXBB family Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: amlogic: Add spifc support to Amlogic's GXBB family jbrunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-13 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: amlogic: Add spifc support to Amlogic's GXBB family Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-13 16:30 +0200
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-12 22:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: amlogic: Add spifc support to Amlogic's GXBB family |
| Message-ID | <sgGbg-8rR-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > This patch series adds the necessary pins, clocks and device tree nodes to > enable the spifc controller on the GXBB family. I had to add the nand pins > in pintctrl as the pinmux setting left by u-boot was conflicting with the > spifc pinmux during my test on the P200. This series seems to be missing a patch which enables the SPIfc on the P200 board for use with the on-board NOR flash. Kevin > Changes since v1 at : http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473261223-15412-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com > * Omit patches : > - dt-bindings: spi-meson: Add GXBB Compatible string > - spi: meson: Add GXBB compatible > Sent as dedicated series > * Omit patch: > - clk: gxbb: expose spifc clock > Already applied > * Rename SPI flash controller pins from spifc_* to nor_* to keep the > name aligned with the datasheet > > Jerome Brunet (3): > pinctrl: amlogic: gxbb: add spi nor pins > pinctrl: amlogic: gxbb: add nand pins > ARM64: dts: amlogic: add spi nor pins > > Neil Armstrong (1): > ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add SPIFC node > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++ > drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson-gxbb.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jbrunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: amlogic: Add spifc support to Amlogic's GXBB family |
| Message-ID | <sgQX0-7Cf-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1481947 |
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 13:38 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > > > > > This patch series adds the necessary pins, clocks and device tree > > nodes to > > enable the spifc controller on the GXBB family. I had to add the > > nand pins > > in pintctrl as the pinmux setting left by u-boot was conflicting > > with the > > spifc pinmux during my test on the P200. > > This series seems to be missing a patch which enables the SPIfc on > the > P200 board for use with the on-board NOR flash. > > Kevin > Indeed, I did not provide this patch, on purpose. The SPI-NOR at 4U2 on the P200 schematics was not present on the board I have. I assumed this was the case for all other P200 as well. In addition, to enable the SPI-NOR, you would also need to solder something at 4R3 (SPI_CS signal disconnected by default) Finally, all the SPIfc lines are shared with the NAND controller which, like the SPI-NOR, appears on the schematics (4CCN1) but is not soldered on the actual hardware. Of course, I can share such patch for testing purposes if you would like me to. Jerome. > > > > Changes since v1 at : http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473261223-15412-1-g > > it-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com > > * Omit patches : > > - dt-bindings: spi-meson: Add GXBB Compatible string > > - spi: meson: Add GXBB compatible > > Sent as dedicated series > > * Omit patch: > > - clk: gxbb: expose spifc clock > > Already applied > > * Rename SPI flash controller pins from spifc_* to nor_* to keep > > the > > name aligned with the datasheet > > > > Jerome Brunet (3): > > pinctrl: amlogic: gxbb: add spi nor pins > > pinctrl: amlogic: gxbb: add nand pins > > ARM64: dts: amlogic: add spi nor pins > > > > Neil Armstrong (1): > > ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb: Add SPIFC node > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++ > > drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson-gxbb.c | 37 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgWSJ-35y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1482232 |
jbrunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 13:38 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: >> >> > >> > This patch series adds the necessary pins, clocks and device tree >> > nodes to >> > enable the spifc controller on the GXBB family. I had to add the >> > nand pins >> > in pintctrl as the pinmux setting left by u-boot was conflicting >> > with the >> > spifc pinmux during my test on the P200. >> >> This series seems to be missing a patch which enables the SPIfc on >> the >> P200 board for use with the on-board NOR flash. >> > > Indeed, I did not provide this patch, on purpose. > The SPI-NOR at 4U2 on the P200 schematics was not present on the board > I have. I assumed this was the case for all other P200 as well. > > In addition, to enable the SPI-NOR, you would also need to solder > something at 4R3 (SPI_CS signal disconnected by default) OK, that makes seense. I thought the NOR was on the board by default. > Finally, all the SPIfc lines are shared with the NAND controller which, > like the SPI-NOR, appears on the schematics (4CCN1) but is not soldered > on the actual hardware. > > Of course, I can share such patch for testing purposes if you would > like me to. Yeah, having a testing patch in the list archives would be useful. Thanks, Kevin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web