Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1482010 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Audio support for adv7511 hdmi bridge

Started byJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
First post2016-09-13 00:00 +0200
Last post2016-09-13 00:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Audio support for adv7511 hdmi bridge John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-09-13 00:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Audio support for adv7511 hdmi bridge Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-13 00:30 +0200

#1482010 — Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Audio support for adv7511 hdmi bridge

FromJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-13 00:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2 v3] Audio support for adv7511 hdmi bridge
Message-ID<sgHqF-NE-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:22 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> This is another swing at getting the adv7511 hdmi bridge
> audio support reviewed.
>
> I've taken the core audio work done by Lars-Peter Clausen, and
> adapted by Srinivas Kandagatla and Archit Taneja, and tried to
> rework it to use the hdmi-codec sound driver.
>
> This patchset, along with the i2s driver and dts changes allows
> HDMI audio to work on the HiKey board.
>
> I'd really appreciate any thoughts or feedback.
>
> New in v3:
> * Dropped unnecessary first patch
> * Made a few clenaups suggested by Laurent
> * Made audio a config time option, as suggested by Laurent
> * Folded in Andy Green's audio packet initialization patch

Ping? Just wanted to see if there was any other feedback on this?

thanks
-john

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1482041

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2016-09-13 00:30 +0200
Message-ID<sgHTI-1ge-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1482010

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:58:44PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:

> Ping? Just wanted to see if there was any other feedback on this?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings just adds to the mail volume (if they are
seen at all) and if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the
patches anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web