Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1481524 > unrolled thread

RE: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators

Started bySteve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
First post2016-09-12 18:20 +0200
Last post2016-09-12 22:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  RE: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array  pdata->regulators Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> - 2016-09-12 18:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array  pdata->regulators Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-09-12 22:50 +0200

#1481524 — RE: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators

FromSteve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Date2016-09-12 18:20 +0200
SubjectRE: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators
Message-ID<sgC7D-5D9-7@gated-at.bofh.it>


On 08 September 2016 10:47, Colin King wrote:

> To: Support Opensource; Liam Girdwood; Mark Brown
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators
> 
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> pdata->regulators is an array of DA9052_MAX_REGULATORS struct
> regulator_init_data pointers hence cannot be null, so the null pointer
> check on pdata->regulators is redundant.  Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9055-
> regulator.c
> index d029c94..a118f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int da9055_regulator_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>  	config.driver_data = regulator;
>  	config.regmap = da9055->regmap;
> 
> -	if (pdata && pdata->regulators) {
> +	if (pdata) {
>  		config.init_data = pdata->regulators[pdev->id];
>  	} else {
>  		ret = da9055_regulator_dt_init(pdev, regulator, &config,
> --
> 2.9.3

Yes, it's true. 

One my colleagues just pointed out why they had déjà vu.

May  I refer to the answer that was given back in March,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8679771/

Regards,
Steve


[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1481951

FromColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2016-09-12 22:50 +0200
Message-ID<sgGkV-8vM-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1481524
On 12/09/16 17:09, Steve Twiss wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 08 September 2016 10:47, Colin King wrote:
> 
>> To: Support Opensource; Liam Girdwood; Mark Brown
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators
>>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> pdata->regulators is an array of DA9052_MAX_REGULATORS struct
>> regulator_init_data pointers hence cannot be null, so the null pointer
>> check on pdata->regulators is redundant.  Remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9055-
>> regulator.c
>> index d029c94..a118f63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
>> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int da9055_regulator_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  	config.driver_data = regulator;
>>  	config.regmap = da9055->regmap;
>>
>> -	if (pdata && pdata->regulators) {
>> +	if (pdata) {
>>  		config.init_data = pdata->regulators[pdev->id];
>>  	} else {
>>  		ret = da9055_regulator_dt_init(pdev, regulator, &config,
>> --
>> 2.9.3
> 
> Yes, it's true. 
> 
> One my colleagues just pointed out why they had déjà vu.
> 
> May  I refer to the answer that was given back in March,
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8679771/
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> 
Apologies for the noise. I lost track of my original patch.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web