Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1481323 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: select TRACER_MAX_TRACE Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-12 16:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: select TRACER_MAX_TRACE |
| Message-ID | <sgA5Q-4ka-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:08:31 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > hwlat_trace cannot work without CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE: > > kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample': > kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'; did you mean 'max_lock'? > if (sample > tr->max_latency) > ^~ > kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:259:6: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'; did you mean 'max_lock'? > tr->max_latency = sample; > ^~ > kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'hwlat_tracer_init': > kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:583:4: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'; did you mean 'max_lock'? > tr->max_latency = 0; > > We also have to enable CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT, which in turn > is a dependency of CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE. Hi Arnd, Thanks. Randy Dunlap already reported this, and it's been fixed. I just finished testing and it will be uploaded today. The real fix was posted in the thread here: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d6c3b7eb-ba95-1ffa-0453-464e1e24262a@infradead.org -- Steve
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web