Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1479988 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian.siewior@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-09 15:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-09 15:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] sc16is7xx: drop bogus use of IRQF_ONESHOT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian.siewior@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-09 15:20 +0200
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian.siewior@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sc16is7xx: drop bogus use of IRQF_ONESHOT |
| Message-ID | <sftSN-3gY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 2016-02-18 11:26:12 [-0600], Josh Cartwright wrote: > The use of IRQF_ONESHOT when registering an interrupt handler with > request_irq() is non-sensical. > > Not only that, it also prevents the handler from being threaded when it > otherwise should be w/ IRQ_FORCED_THREADING is enabled. This causes the > following deadlock observed by Sean Nyekjaer on -rt: So we this patch http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1602.2/02637.html sitting in -RT. Then someone posted http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg14975.html which depends on it. Before I was are of the first patch, I posted http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg14666.html and nobody seems to care if anything of this gets merged upstream where it belongs. Could some please carry this to Greg upstream? Sebastian
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web