Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1479547 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-09 00:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-09 00:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4] lib/bitmap.c: enhance bitmap syntax Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-09 00:20 +0200
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] lib/bitmap.c: enhance bitmap syntax |
| Message-ID | <sffPQ-3bV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:33:25 +0300 Noam Camus <noamca@mellanox.com> wrote: > Today there are platforms with many CPUs (up to 4K). > Trying to boot only part of the CPUs may result in too long string. > > For example lets take NPS platform that is part of arch/arc. > This platform have SMP system with 256 cores each with > 16 HW threads (SMT machine) where HW thread appears as CPU to the kernel. > In this example there is total of 4K CPUs. > When one tries to boot only part of the HW threads from each core the > string representing the map may be long... > For example if for sake of performance we decided to boot only first half > of HW threads of each core the map will look like: > 0-7,16-23,32-39,...,4080-4087 > > This patch introduce new syntax to accommodate with such use case. > I added an optional postfix to a range of CPUs which will choose > according to given modulo the desired range of reminders i.e.: > <cpus range>:sed_size/group_size > > For example, above map can be described in new syntax like this: > 0-4095:8/16 There should be some updates to the user-facing documentation, please. Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, mainly. Which boot parameters does this affect? For example, I think it accidentally alters isolcpus=? It would be useful to see the patch which wires this up (to arch/arc?).
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web