Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1477253 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-06 12:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-06 18:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] iio: light: acpi-als: Add a tuning parameter interface. Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> - 2016-09-06 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] iio: light: acpi-als: Add a tuning parameter interface. Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-09-06 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] iio: light: acpi-als: Add a tuning parameter interface. Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 18:50 +0200
| From | Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-06 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] iio: light: acpi-als: Add a tuning parameter interface. |
| Message-ID | <selNE-MN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Bryan Freed <bfreed@chromium.org>
Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE to the channel to scale up or down
the raw measurements through the IIO framework.
Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED to provide the interface to read the
scaled measurements through the in_illuminance_input file.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Freed <bfreed@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
---
drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
index f0b47c5..40837bc 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec acpi_als_channels[] = {
},
/* _RAW is here for backward ABI compatibility */
.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
- BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
+ BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) |
+ BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE),
},
};
@@ -76,6 +77,9 @@ struct acpi_als {
struct mutex lock;
s32 evt_buffer[ACPI_ALS_EVT_BUFFER_SIZE];
+
+ uint als_scale;
+ uint als_uscale;
};
/*
@@ -154,25 +158,60 @@ static int acpi_als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
s32 temp_val;
int ret;
- if ((mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) && (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW))
- return -EINVAL;
-
/* we support only illumination (_ALI) so far. */
if (chan->type != IIO_LIGHT)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = acpi_als_read_value(als, ACPI_ALS_ILLUMINANCE, &temp_val);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ switch (mask) {
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
+ ret = acpi_als_read_value(als, ACPI_ALS_ILLUMINANCE, &temp_val);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ if (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) {
+ /* use u64 to avoid overflow */
+ u64 ulux = (u64) temp_val * 1000000;
+
+ mutex_lock(&als->lock);
+ ulux = ulux * als->als_scale +
+ div_u64(ulux * als->als_uscale, 1000000U);
+ mutex_unlock(&als->lock);
+ *val = div_u64(ulux, 1000000U);
+ } else {
+ *val = temp_val;
+ }
+ return IIO_VAL_INT;
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
+ mutex_lock(&als->lock);
+ *val = als->als_scale;
+ *val2 = als->als_uscale;
+ mutex_unlock(&als->lock);
+ return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+}
- *val = temp_val;
+static int acpi_als_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio,
+ struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val,
+ int val2, long mask)
+{
+ struct acpi_als *als = iio_priv(iio);
+
+ if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE || chan->type != IIO_LIGHT)
+ return -EINVAL;
- return IIO_VAL_INT;
+ mutex_lock(&als->lock);
+ als->als_scale = val;
+ als->als_uscale = val2;
+ mutex_unlock(&als->lock);
+ return 0;
}
static const struct iio_info acpi_als_info = {
.driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
.read_raw = acpi_als_read_raw,
+ .write_raw = acpi_als_write_raw,
};
static int acpi_als_add(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -189,6 +228,8 @@ static int acpi_als_add(struct acpi_device *device)
device->driver_data = indio_dev;
als->device = device;
+ als->als_scale = 1;
+ als->als_uscale = 0;
mutex_init(&als->lock);
indio_dev->name = ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME;
--
2.1.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-06 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <selXj-PI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1477253 |
On 09/06/2016 12:25 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > From: Bryan Freed <bfreed@chromium.org> > > Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE to the channel to scale up or down > the raw measurements through the IIO framework. > > Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED to provide the interface to read the > scaled measurements through the in_illuminance_input file. What is the use-case for this, how is this interface supposed to be used?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-06 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <serJo-4tA-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1477265 |
Hi Lars, 2016-09-06 12:31 GMT+02:00 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>: > On 09/06/2016 12:25 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: >> From: Bryan Freed <bfreed@chromium.org> >> >> Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE to the channel to scale up or down >> the raw measurements through the IIO framework. >> >> Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED to provide the interface to read the >> scaled measurements through the in_illuminance_input file. > > What is the use-case for this, how is this interface supposed to be used? The idea behind this is be able to do a per-device calibration. The use case we're thinking is: 1. Read raw measurements from sensor in controlled environment (at 30, 500 and 1000 lux) 2. do some math to calculate the calibration value. 3. write the value to calibscale (in_illuminance_calibscale) 4. read the calibrated measurement (in_illuminance_input) Regards, Enric
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web