Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1472935 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-31 01:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-01 18:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-31 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2016-08-31 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-08-31 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2016-09-01 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-01 18:30 +0200
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-31 01:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] re-enable DAX PMD support |
| Message-ID | <sc0kh-2Sd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:10PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based > locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree > based locking scheme so that they can be re-enabled. > > Changes since v1: > - PMD entry locking is now done based on the starting offset of the PMD > entry, rather than on the radix tree slot which was unreliable. (Jan) > - Fixed the one issue I could find with hole punch. As far as I can tell > hole punch now works correctly for both PMD and PTE DAX entries, 4k zero > pages and huge zero pages. > - Fixed the way that ext2 returns the size of holes in ext2_get_block(). > (Jan) > - Made the 'wait_table' global variable static in respnse to a sparse > warning. > - Fixed some more inconsitent usage between the names 'ret' and 'entry' > for radix tree entry variables. > > Ross Zwisler (9): > ext4: allow DAX writeback for hole punch > ext2: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > ext4: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > dax: remove buffer_size_valid() > dax: make 'wait_table' global variable static > dax: consistent variable naming for DAX entries > dax: coordinate locking for offsets in PMD range > dax: re-enable DAX PMD support > dax: remove "depends on BROKEN" from FS_DAX_PMD > > fs/Kconfig | 1 - > fs/dax.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > fs/ext2/inode.c | 3 + > fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +- > include/linux/dax.h | 29 ++++- > mm/filemap.c | 6 +- > 6 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.9.0 Ping on this series? Any objections or comments?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-31 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sckiZ-74j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1472935 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:01 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:10PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix > > tree based locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in > > the DAX radix tree based locking scheme so that they can be re- > > enabled. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - PMD entry locking is now done based on the starting offset of > > the PMD entry, rather than on the radix tree slot which was > > unreliable. (Jan) > > - Fixed the one issue I could find with hole punch. As far as I > > can tell hole punch now works correctly for both PMD and PTE DAX > > entries, 4k zero pages and huge zero pages. > > - Fixed the way that ext2 returns the size of holes in > > ext2_get_block(). (Jan) > > - Made the 'wait_table' global variable static in respnse to a > > sparse warning. > > - Fixed some more inconsitent usage between the names 'ret' and > > 'entry' for radix tree entry variables. > > > > Ross Zwisler (9): > > ext4: allow DAX writeback for hole punch > > ext2: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > > ext4: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > > dax: remove buffer_size_valid() > > dax: make 'wait_table' global variable static > > dax: consistent variable naming for DAX entries > > dax: coordinate locking for offsets in PMD range > > dax: re-enable DAX PMD support > > dax: remove "depends on BROKEN" from FS_DAX_PMD > > > > fs/Kconfig | 1 - > > fs/dax.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > ------------ > > fs/ext2/inode.c | 3 + > > fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +- > > include/linux/dax.h | 29 ++++- > > mm/filemap.c | 6 +- > > 6 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.9.0 > > Ping on this series? Any objections or comments? Hi Ross, I am seeing a major performance loss in fio mmap test with this patch- set applied. This happens with or without my patches [1] applied on top of yours. Without my patches, dax_pmd_fault() falls back to the pte handler since an mmap'ed address is not 2MB-aligned. I have attached three test results. o rc4.log - 4.8.0-rc4 (base) o non-pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset (fall back to pte) o pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset + my patchset (use pmd maps) My test steps are as follows. mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc -C 2M /dev/pmem0 mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem0 numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --cpunodebind block:pmem0 fio test.fio "test.fio" --- [global] bs=4k size=2G directory=/mnt/pmem0 ioengine=mmap [randrw] rw=randrw --- Can you please take a look? Thanks, -Toshi [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/29/560
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-31 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <scloK-7GT-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1473829 |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:20:48PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:01 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:10PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > > > > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix > > > tree based locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in > > > the DAX radix tree based locking scheme so that they can be re- > > > enabled. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > - PMD entry locking is now done based on the starting offset of > > > the PMD entry, rather than on the radix tree slot which was > > > unreliable. (Jan) > > > - Fixed the one issue I could find with hole punch. As far as I > > > can tell hole punch now works correctly for both PMD and PTE DAX > > > entries, 4k zero pages and huge zero pages. > > > - Fixed the way that ext2 returns the size of holes in > > > ext2_get_block(). (Jan) > > > - Made the 'wait_table' global variable static in respnse to a > > > sparse warning. > > > - Fixed some more inconsitent usage between the names 'ret' and > > > 'entry' for radix tree entry variables. > > > > > > Ross Zwisler (9): > > > ext4: allow DAX writeback for hole punch > > > ext2: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > > > ext4: tell DAX the size of allocation holes > > > dax: remove buffer_size_valid() > > > dax: make 'wait_table' global variable static > > > dax: consistent variable naming for DAX entries > > > dax: coordinate locking for offsets in PMD range > > > dax: re-enable DAX PMD support > > > dax: remove "depends on BROKEN" from FS_DAX_PMD > > > > > > fs/Kconfig | 1 - > > > fs/dax.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > ------------ > > > fs/ext2/inode.c | 3 + > > > fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +- > > > include/linux/dax.h | 29 ++++- > > > mm/filemap.c | 6 +- > > > 6 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.9.0 > > > > Ping on this series? Any objections or comments? > > Hi Ross, > > I am seeing a major performance loss in fio mmap test with this patch- > set applied. This happens with or without my patches [1] applied on > top of yours. Without my patches, dax_pmd_fault() falls back to the > pte handler since an mmap'ed address is not 2MB-aligned. > > I have attached three test results. > o rc4.log - 4.8.0-rc4 (base) > o non-pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset (fall back to pte) > o pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset + my patchset (use pmd maps) > > My test steps are as follows. > > mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc -C 2M /dev/pmem0 > mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem0 > numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --cpunodebind block:pmem0 fio test.fio > > "test.fio" > --- > [global] > bs=4k > size=2G > directory=/mnt/pmem0 > ioengine=mmap > [randrw] > rw=randrw > --- > > Can you please take a look? Yep, thanks for the report.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-01 00:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sclRL-86A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1473899 |
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 15:36 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:20:48PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:01 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:10PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: : > > > > > > Ping on this series? Any objections or comments? > > > > Hi Ross, > > > > I am seeing a major performance loss in fio mmap test with this > > patch-set applied. This happens with or without my patches [1] > > applied on top of yours. Without my patches, dax_pmd_fault() falls > > back to the pte handler since an mmap'ed address is not 2MB- > > aligned. > > > > I have attached three test results. > > o rc4.log - 4.8.0-rc4 (base) > > o non-pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset (fall back to pte) > > o pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset + my patchset (use pmd maps) > > > > My test steps are as follows. > > > > mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc -C 2M /dev/pmem0 > > mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem0 > > numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --cpunodebind block:pmem0 fio > > test.fio > > > > "test.fio" > > --- > > [global] > > bs=4k > > size=2G > > directory=/mnt/pmem0 > > ioengine=mmap > > [randrw] > > rw=randrw > > --- > > > > Can you please take a look? > > Yep, thanks for the report. I have some more observations. It seems this issue is related with pmd mappings after all. fio creates "randrw.0.0" file. In my setup, an initial test run creates pmd mappings and hits this issue. Subsequent test runs (i.e. randrw.0.0 exists), without my patches, fall back to pte mappings and do not hit this issue. With my patches applied, subsequent runs still create pmd mappings and hit this issue. Thanks, -Toshi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-01 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <scD2i-4er-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1473925 |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:08:59PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 15:36 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:20:48PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:01 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:10PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > : > > > > > > > > Ping on this series? Any objections or comments? > > > > > > Hi Ross, > > > > > > I am seeing a major performance loss in fio mmap test with this > > > patch-set applied. This happens with or without my patches [1] > > > applied on top of yours. Without my patches, dax_pmd_fault() falls > > > back to the pte handler since an mmap'ed address is not 2MB- > > > aligned. > > > > > > I have attached three test results. > > > o rc4.log - 4.8.0-rc4 (base) > > > o non-pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset (fall back to pte) > > > o pmd.log - 4.8.0-rc4 + your patchset + my patchset (use pmd maps) > > > > > > My test steps are as follows. > > > > > > mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc -C 2M /dev/pmem0 > > > mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem0 > > > numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --cpunodebind block:pmem0 fio > > > test.fio > > > > > > "test.fio" > > > --- > > > [global] > > > bs=4k > > > size=2G > > > directory=/mnt/pmem0 > > > ioengine=mmap > > > [randrw] > > > rw=randrw > > > --- > > > > > > Can you please take a look? > > > > Yep, thanks for the report. > > I have some more observations. It seems this issue is related with pmd > mappings after all. fio creates "randrw.0.0" file. In my setup, an > initial test run creates pmd mappings and hits this issue. Subsequent > test runs (i.e. randrw.0.0 exists), without my patches, fall back to > pte mappings and do not hit this issue. With my patches applied, > subsequent runs still create pmd mappings and hit this issue. I've been able to reproduce this on my test setup, and I agree that it appears to be related to the PMD mappings. Here's my performance with 4k mappings, either before my set or without your patches: READ: io=1022.7MB, aggrb=590299KB/s, minb=590299KB/s, maxb=590299KB/s, mint=1774msec, maxt=1774msec WRITE: io=1025.4MB, aggrb=591860KB/s, minb=591860KB/s, maxb=591860KB/s, mint=1774msec, maxt=1774msec And with 2 MiB pages: READ: io=1022.7MB, aggrb=17931KB/s, minb=17931KB/s, maxb=17931KB/s, mint=58401msec, maxt=58401msec WRITE: io=1025.4MB, aggrb=17978KB/s, minb=17978KB/s, maxb=17978KB/s, mint=58401msec, maxt=58401msec Dan is seeing something similar with his device DAX code with 2MiB pages, so our best guess right now is that it must be in the PMD MM code, since that's really the only thing that the fs/dax and device/dax implementations share. Interestingly, I'm getting the opposite results when testing in my VM. Here's the performance with 4k pages: READ: io=1022.7MB, aggrb=251728KB/s, minb=251728KB/s, maxb=251728KB/s, mint=4160msec, maxt=4160msec WRITE: io=1025.4MB, aggrb=252394KB/s, minb=252394KB/s, maxb=252394KB/s, mint=4160msec, maxt=4160msec And with 2MiB pages: READ: io=1022.7MB, aggrb=902751KB/s, minb=902751KB/s, maxb=902751KB/s, mint=1160msec, maxt=1160msec WRITE: io=1025.4MB, aggrb=905137KB/s, minb=905137KB/s, maxb=905137KB/s, mint=1160msec, maxt=1160msec This is a totally different system, so the halved 4k performance in the VM isn't comparable to my bare metal system, but it's interesting that the use of PMDs over tripled the performance in my VM. Hmm... We'll keep digging into this. Thanks again for the report. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web