Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1473364 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular |
| Message-ID | <sccbL-1TJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > >> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: > >> > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_ALTERA_A10SR > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig: bool "Altera Arria10 DevKit System Resource chip" > >> > >> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. > >> > >> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that > >> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. > >> > > [...] > > >> > >> Cc: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com> > >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/altera-a10sr.c | 14 ++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > Hi Lee, > > I never did see this applied copy of the patch loop around via linux-next > and conflict with my local copy of the same patch. Same for 3,4,5,6 of > the same series (patch #2 was not applied; it was dropped in favour of > a redo as a tristate conversion.) > > Just wanting to double check I didn't mess something up that caused them > to get silently dropped after the fact, before I prepare to send any additional > mfd patches to be considered for your 4.9 content queue. It's been dropped. Make your subsequent changes. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web