Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1473364 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular

Started byLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
First post2016-08-31 13:50 +0200
Last post2016-08-31 13:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200

#1473364 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-08-31 13:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular
Message-ID<sccbL-1TJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> >> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >>
> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_ALTERA_A10SR
> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:    bool "Altera Arria10 DevKit System Resource chip"
> >>
> >> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> >>
> >> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> >> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> >>
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>
> >> Cc: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
> >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/altera-a10sr.c | 14 ++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> I never did see this applied copy of the patch loop around via linux-next
> and conflict with my local copy of the same patch.  Same for 3,4,5,6 of
> the same series (patch #2 was not applied; it was dropped in favour of
> a redo as a tristate conversion.)
> 
> Just wanting to double check I didn't mess something up that caused them
> to get silently dropped after the fact, before I prepare to send any additional
> mfd patches to be considered for your 4.9 content queue.

It's been dropped.  Make your subsequent changes.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web