Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471467 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ARM,SoC: About the use DT-defined properties by 3rd-party drivers Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
| From | Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: ARM,SoC: About the use DT-defined properties by 3rd-party drivers |
| Message-ID | <sbfv4-6Ra-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> wrote: > > If this is really not possible, it forces the SoC manufacturer to expose > those properties in a different way, thus wasting a (seemingly) perfectly > fine way of doing so: the DT and its documentation. When you submit a new driver upstream, that patch also includes the new device tree nodes and documentation for those nodes. Everything is peer-reviewed together. I don't understand what you think the problem is.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web