Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1472148 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] introduce get_task_exe_file and use it to fix audit_exe_compare

Started byPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
First post2016-08-30 01:00 +0200
Last post2016-08-31 22:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] introduce get_task_exe_file and use it to fix audit_exe_compare Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-08-30 01:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] introduce get_task_exe_file and use it to fix audit_exe_compare Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-08-31 22:30 +0200

#1472148 — Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] introduce get_task_exe_file and use it to fix audit_exe_compare

FromPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date2016-08-30 01:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 0/2] introduce get_task_exe_file and use it to fix audit_exe_compare
Message-ID<sbDH3-4VF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> wrote:
> audit_exe_compare directly accesses mm->exe_file without making sure the
> object is stable. Fixing it using current primitives results in
> partially duplicating what proc_exe_link is doing.
>
> As such, introduce a trivial helper which can be used in both places and
> fix the func.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * removed an unused 'out' label which crept in
>
> Mateusz Guzik (2):
>   mm: introduce get_task_exe_file
>   audit: fix exe_file access in audit_exe_compare
>
>  fs/proc/base.c       |  7 +------
>  include/linux/mm.h   |  1 +
>  kernel/audit_watch.c |  8 +++++---
>  kernel/fork.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Thanks for doing this.

Both patches look fine to me, does anyone in the mm area have any
objections?  If not, I'll merge these into the audit tree and mark
them for stable.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1473827

FromPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date2016-08-31 22:30 +0200
Message-ID<sckiZ-74j-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1472148
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> wrote:
>> audit_exe_compare directly accesses mm->exe_file without making sure the
>> object is stable. Fixing it using current primitives results in
>> partially duplicating what proc_exe_link is doing.
>>
>> As such, introduce a trivial helper which can be used in both places and
>> fix the func.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> * removed an unused 'out' label which crept in
>>
>> Mateusz Guzik (2):
>>   mm: introduce get_task_exe_file
>>   audit: fix exe_file access in audit_exe_compare
>>
>>  fs/proc/base.c       |  7 +------
>>  include/linux/mm.h   |  1 +
>>  kernel/audit_watch.c |  8 +++++---
>>  kernel/fork.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> Both patches look fine to me, does anyone in the mm area have any
> objections?  If not, I'll merge these into the audit tree and mark
> them for stable.

I just merged these patches into audit#stable-4.8 and have a kernel
building now, as soon as it finishes I'll do some quick sanity tests
and send them off to Linus.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web