Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1470346 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-25 21:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-27 02:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] Documentation: kdump: remind user of nr_cpus Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-08-25 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] Documentation: kdump: remind user of nr_cpus Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-27 02:40 +0200
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] Documentation: kdump: remind user of nr_cpus |
| Message-ID | <sa8lX-56n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:06:45 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Jon, do you think change as below is OK to you? So nr_cpus is the maximum value, and maxcpus is the current number. Figures. No wonder the documentation is confusing... Anyway, this is much more along the lines of what I was hoping for, yes; I'll go ahead and apply it. Many thanks for humoring me on this! jon
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sazPb-5US-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1470346 |
On 08/25/16 at 01:10pm, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:06:45 +0800 > Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jon, do you think change as below is OK to you? > > So nr_cpus is the maximum value, and maxcpus is the current number. > Figures. No wonder the documentation is confusing... Yes. Thanks for reviewing this patchset.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web