Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1470017 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2016-08-25 11:50 +0200
Last post2016-09-05 15:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-25 11:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog() Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog() Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-09-05 15:50 +0200

#1470017 — [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2016-08-25 11:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()
Message-ID<s9Zsl-7H6-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200

* A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
  indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
  Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
index 677e29e..311022a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
 	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
 
 	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
-	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
 		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470082

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2016-08-25 13:40 +0200
Message-ID<sa1aN-nw-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470017

On 25/08/2016 11:40, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 677e29e..311022a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
>  	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
>  
>  	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> -	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
>  		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1476468

FromMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date2016-09-05 15:50 +0200
Message-ID<se2rE-4pk-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470017
On Thu, 25 Aug, at 11:40:45AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 677e29e..311022a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
>  	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
>  
>  	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> -	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
>  		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);

Thanks, applied with Paolo's Reviewed-by.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web