Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1557878 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-12 23:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-13 19:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] Documentation: cpuset: Fix 'cpuset.tasks' -> 'tasks' "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2017-01-12 23:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpuset: Fix 'cpuset.tasks' -> 'tasks' Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-13 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpuset: Fix 'cpuset.tasks' -> 'tasks' "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2017-01-13 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpuset: Fix 'cpuset.tasks' -> 'tasks' Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-13 19:10 +0100
| From | "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 23:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Documentation: cpuset: Fix 'cpuset.tasks' -> 'tasks' |
| Message-ID | <sYWci-196-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This looks like it was accidentally caught up in e21a05cb (doc: cpuset: Update the cpuset flag file, 2010-02-24). While I'm touching the line, also fix the posessive "cpusets" -> "cpuset's". Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> --- Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) This patch is based on v4.9, but the lines I'm touching don't churn much so it should apply to any recent version. diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt index e5ac5da86..8402dd6 100644 --- a/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt +++ b/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ to allocate a page of memory for that task. If a cpuset has its 'cpuset.cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately. Similarly, -if a task's pid is written to another cpusets 'cpuset.tasks' file, then its +if a task's pid is written to another cpuset's 'tasks' file, then its allowed CPU placement is changed immediately. If such a task had been bound to some subset of its cpuset using the sched_setaffinity() call, the task will be allowed to run on any CPU allowed in its new cpuset, -- 2.1.0.60.g85f0837
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-13 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZdPQ-3DF-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557878 |
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:24:27 -0800 "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote: > This looks like it was accidentally caught up in e21a05cb (doc: > cpuset: Update the cpuset flag file, 2010-02-24). > > While I'm touching the line, also fix the posessive "cpusets" -> > "cpuset's". > > Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> > --- > Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This patch is based on v4.9, but the lines I'm touching don't churn > much so it should apply to any recent version. > > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt > index e5ac5da86..8402dd6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt > +++ b/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cpusets.txt > @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ to allocate a page of memory for that task. > > If a cpuset has its 'cpuset.cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset > will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately. Similarly, > -if a task's pid is written to another cpusets 'cpuset.tasks' file, then its > +if a task's pid is written to another cpuset's 'tasks' file, then its So I'll confess that I don't understand this change. All of the control files are referred to as cpuset.whatever in this document; why should this one, in particular, be different? Thanks, jon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-13 18:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZe9c-3Kc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1558628 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:27:42AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > -if a task's pid is written to another cpusets 'cpuset.tasks' file, then its > > +if a task's pid is written to another cpuset's 'tasks' file, then its > > So I'll confess that I don't understand this change. All of the > control files are referred to as cpuset.whatever in this document; > why should this one, in particular, be different? 'tasks' is part of the generic cgroup tooling, so it doesn't get the cpuset prefix: $ ls /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/*tasks* /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/tasks Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-13 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZesx-460-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1558639 |
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:44:34 -0800 "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote: > > So I'll confess that I don't understand this change. All of the > > control files are referred to as cpuset.whatever in this document; > > why should this one, in particular, be different? > > 'tasks' is part of the generic cgroup tooling, so it doesn't get the > cpuset prefix: Duh, of course. Got more coffee now and applied it, thanks. jon
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web