Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1558062 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state()

Started byOleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
First post2017-01-13 08:00 +0100
Last post2017-01-13 08:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state() Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> - 2017-01-13 08:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls  into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-01-13 08:50 +0100

#1558062 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state()

FromOleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Date2017-01-13 08:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state()
Message-ID<sZ409-62y-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Jan 1, 2017, at 11:35 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:40:29 +0100
> 
> Some data were printed into a sequence by two separate function calls.
> Print the same data by a single function call instead.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c
> index b9c522a3c7a4..a6ca48d7e96b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c
> @@ -460,11 +460,8 @@ int lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> 
> 	imp = obd->u.cli.cl_import;
> 	ocd = &imp->imp_connect_data;
> -
> -	seq_printf(m, "imperative_recovery: %s\n",
> +	seq_printf(m, "imperative_recovery: %s\nclient_state:\n",
> 		   OCD_HAS_FLAG(ocd, IMP_RECOV) ? "ENABLED" : "DISABLED");
> -	seq_printf(m, "client_state:\n");
> -

Ugh, do we really need this?
I know it saves one call to seq_printf, but this is not a super performance-critical
code, and two calls are actually easier to read, don't you think?

> 	spin_lock(&config_list_lock);
> 	list_for_each_entry(cld, &config_llog_list, cld_list_chain) {
> 		if (!cld->cld_recover)
> -- 
> 2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1558078 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state()

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-01-13 08:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] staging/lustre/mgc: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in lprocfs_mgc_rd_ir_state()
Message-ID<sZ4Mx-6xa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1558062
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 01:58:37AM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> 
> On Jan 1, 2017, at 11:35 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

<snip>

Oleg, please realize that I have blacklisted this patch author, and
don't take contributions from them, unless you, or someone else wishes
to properly review and pass them on.  I've found that personally, it's
just a waste of time working with them, but you are free to do whatever
you wish...

good luck!

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web