Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1554023 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-09 04:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-11 02:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-09 04:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-01-11 02:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-11 02:30 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-09 04:00 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree |
| Message-ID | <sXylH-6zC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
between commit:
2c257ce6ab6f ("dt-bindings: add used but undocumented rockchip grf compatible values")
from the rockchip tree and patch:
"scripts/spelling.txt: add "followings" pattern and fix typo instances"
from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
index c6e62cb30712,76d6ccf677f5..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
@@@ -10,19 -9,16 +10,19 @@@ From RK3368 SoCs, the GRF is divided in
Required Properties:
- - compatible: GRF should be one of the followings
+ - compatible: GRF should be one of the following:
+ - "rockchip,rk3036-grf", "syscon": for rk3036
- "rockchip,rk3066-grf", "syscon": for rk3066
- "rockchip,rk3188-grf", "syscon": for rk3188
- "rockchip,rk3228-grf", "syscon": for rk3228
- "rockchip,rk3288-grf", "syscon": for rk3288
- "rockchip,rk3368-grf", "syscon": for rk3368
- "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon": for rk3399
- - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the followings
+ - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the following:
- "rockchip,rk3368-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3368
- "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3399
+- compatible: SGRF should be one of the following
+ - "rockchip,rk3288-sgrf", "syscon": for rk3288
- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
region.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-11 02:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYfAm-fa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1554023 |
Hi Andrew,
I have been wondering this
because this series is touching files across sub-systems.
I expected it would be pulled into upstream
during the previous MW, but it was not.
How long will it stay in your branch?
2017-01-09 11:55 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
>
> between commit:
>
> 2c257ce6ab6f ("dt-bindings: add used but undocumented rockchip grf compatible values")
>
> from the rockchip tree and patch:
>
> "scripts/spelling.txt: add "followings" pattern and fix typo instances"
>
> from the akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> index c6e62cb30712,76d6ccf677f5..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> @@@ -10,19 -9,16 +10,19 @@@ From RK3368 SoCs, the GRF is divided in
>
> Required Properties:
>
> - - compatible: GRF should be one of the followings
> + - compatible: GRF should be one of the following:
> + - "rockchip,rk3036-grf", "syscon": for rk3036
> - "rockchip,rk3066-grf", "syscon": for rk3066
> - "rockchip,rk3188-grf", "syscon": for rk3188
> - "rockchip,rk3228-grf", "syscon": for rk3228
> - "rockchip,rk3288-grf", "syscon": for rk3288
> - "rockchip,rk3368-grf", "syscon": for rk3368
> - "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon": for rk3399
> - - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the followings
> + - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the following:
> - "rockchip,rk3368-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3368
> - "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3399
> +- compatible: SGRF should be one of the following
> + - "rockchip,rk3288-sgrf", "syscon": for rk3288
> - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> region.
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-11 02:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree |
| Message-ID | <sYfTI-lG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1556116 |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:07:33 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> 2017-01-09 11:55 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 2c257ce6ab6f ("dt-bindings: add used but undocumented rockchip grf compatible values")
> >
> > from the rockchip tree and patch:
> >
> > "scripts/spelling.txt: add "followings" pattern and fix typo instances"
> >
> > from the akpm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> > index c6e62cb30712,76d6ccf677f5..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> > @@@ -10,19 -9,16 +10,19 @@@ From RK3368 SoCs, the GRF is divided in
> >
> > Required Properties:
> >
> > - - compatible: GRF should be one of the followings
> > + - compatible: GRF should be one of the following:
> > + - "rockchip,rk3036-grf", "syscon": for rk3036
> > - "rockchip,rk3066-grf", "syscon": for rk3066
> > - "rockchip,rk3188-grf", "syscon": for rk3188
> > - "rockchip,rk3228-grf", "syscon": for rk3228
> > - "rockchip,rk3288-grf", "syscon": for rk3288
> > - "rockchip,rk3368-grf", "syscon": for rk3368
> > - "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon": for rk3399
> > - - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the followings
> > + - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the following:
> > - "rockchip,rk3368-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3368
> > - "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3399
> > +- compatible: SGRF should be one of the following
> > + - "rockchip,rk3288-sgrf", "syscon": for rk3288
> > - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> > region.
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I have been wondering this
> because this series is touching files across sub-systems.
>
> I expected it would be pulled into upstream
> during the previous MW, but it was not.
> How long will it stay in your branch?
(Top-posting fixed. Please don't do that!)
I expect I'll be sending
scripts-spellingtxt-add-several-more-common-spelling-mistakes.patch in
to Linus for 4.11-rc1. If "dt-bindings: add used but undocumented
rockchip grf compatible values" gets merged befoe that, I'll fix up
scripts-spellingtxt-add-several-more-common-spelling-mistakes.patch.
If scripts-spellingtxt-add-several-more-common-spelling-mistakes.patch
get merged first, you'lll need to fix up "dt-bindings: add used but
undocumented rockchip grf compatible values".
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web