Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1557819 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-12 22:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-14 17:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-12 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-13 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-01-14 17:40 +0100
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE |
| Message-ID | <sYUWR-tD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
PGDEACTIVATE represents the number of pages moved from the active list
to the inactive list. At least this sounds like the original motivation
of the counter. move_active_pages_to_lru, however, counts pages which
got freed in the mean time as deactivated as well. This is a very rare
event and counting them as deactivation in itself is not harmful but it
makes the code more convoluted than necessary - we have to count both
all pages and those which are freed which is a bit confusing.
After this patch the PGDEACTIVATE should have a slightly more clear
semantic and only count those pages which are moved from the active to
the inactive list which is a plus.
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
Hi,
Vlastimil has pointed out [1] that move_active_pages_to_lru is more
confusing than necessary because we count two things, pgmoved and
nr_moved. I believe that counting freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE is more
confusing than helpful. I doubt that this patch will make any real
difference in the real life but it at least makes the code easier which
is a plus so I think this is more a cleanup than any bug fix.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/646c3551-e794-611c-5247-490bd89133db@suse.cz
mm/vmscan.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index cf940af609fd..7e1c3cd91fab 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1878,7 +1878,6 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
enum lru_list lru)
{
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
- unsigned long pgmoved = 0;
struct page *page;
int nr_pages;
int nr_moved = 0;
@@ -1893,7 +1892,6 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, page_zonenum(page), nr_pages);
list_move(&page->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]);
- pgmoved += nr_pages;
if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
__ClearPageLRU(page);
@@ -1913,7 +1911,7 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
}
if (!is_active_lru(lru))
- __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved);
+ __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_moved);
return nr_moved;
}
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-13 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZ6Oq-7I1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557819 |
On 01/12/2017 10:12 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > PGDEACTIVATE represents the number of pages moved from the active list > to the inactive list. At least this sounds like the original motivation > of the counter. move_active_pages_to_lru, however, counts pages which > got freed in the mean time as deactivated as well. This is a very rare > event and counting them as deactivation in itself is not harmful but it > makes the code more convoluted than necessary - we have to count both > all pages and those which are freed which is a bit confusing. > > After this patch the PGDEACTIVATE should have a slightly more clear > semantic and only count those pages which are moved from the active to > the inactive list which is a plus. > > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-14 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZzwZ-8bu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557819 |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > PGDEACTIVATE represents the number of pages moved from the active list > to the inactive list. At least this sounds like the original motivation > of the counter. move_active_pages_to_lru, however, counts pages which > got freed in the mean time as deactivated as well. This is a very rare > event and counting them as deactivation in itself is not harmful but it > makes the code more convoluted than necessary - we have to count both > all pages and those which are freed which is a bit confusing. > > After this patch the PGDEACTIVATE should have a slightly more clear > semantic and only count those pages which are moved from the active to > the inactive list which is a plus. > > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> I bet it's a small inaccuracy in practice, but now that the trace patches added a proper counter, might as well consolidate into the correct one. Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web