Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1556356 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-11 11:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-12 04:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 11:10 +0100
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-01-12 04:40 +0100
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-12 13:10 +0100
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-01-12 15:20 +0100
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-01-13 04:30 +0100
Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-01-12 04:40 +0100
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-11 11:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: lkp: make.cross: old aarch64-gcc has been removed |
| Message-ID | <sYo0V-5B1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Ping? BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. So I made a patch for that. Thank you, On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:43:45 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > Hi Fengguang, > > Recently I tried to build a cross-build environment ( https://github.com/mhiramat/linux-cross ) by using your make.cross ( https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross ). > And I've found that it failed to setup cross gcc for aarch64, because it is no more provided by linaro. > > Could you update the url to the newer one from linaro or use crosstool > as like as other archs? > > The latest stable version (gcc-5) can be found here. > http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest-5/ > > There are also gcc-6 series for development, and you can find 4.9 binaries > too. But I would like to recommend you to use stable one for testing. > > Thank you, > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYEp4-7eK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1556356 |
Hi Masami, On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:08:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >Ping? Oops, sorry for overlooking your previous email! >BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. >So I made a patch for that. So there are gcc 4.9, 5, 6 versions available for aarch64. Since the build robot nowadays uses debian's packaged gcc-6-aarch64-linux-gnu, it should be better to use gcc-6 in make.coss to better reproduce reported regressions: http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest/aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-linaro-6.2.1-2016.11-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz There are some other files there and I'm not quite sure if that's the right URL to use. CC aarch64 maintainers for possible inputs. Thanks, Fengguang >On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:43:45 +0900 >Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > >> Hi Fengguang, >> >> Recently I tried to build a cross-build environment ( https://github.com/mhiramat/linux-cross ) by using your make.cross ( https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross ). >> And I've found that it failed to setup cross gcc for aarch64, because it is no more provided by linaro. >> >> Could you update the url to the newer one from linaro or use crosstool >> as like as other archs? >> >> The latest stable version (gcc-5) can be found here. >> http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest-5/ >> >> There are also gcc-6 series for development, and you can find 4.9 binaries >> too. But I would like to recommend you to use stable one for testing. >> >> Thank you, >> >> -- >> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > >-- >Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYMmB-3OG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557089 |
Hi Fengguang, Masami, On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:31:57AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:08:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. > >So I made a patch for that. > > So there are gcc 4.9, 5, 6 versions available for aarch64. Since the > build robot nowadays uses debian's packaged gcc-6-aarch64-linux-gnu, > it should be better to use gcc-6 in make.coss to better reproduce > reported regressions: > > http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest/aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-linaro-6.2.1-2016.11-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > There are some other files there and I'm not quite sure if that's the > right URL to use. CC aarch64 maintainers for possible inputs. If you're looking for a stable url to grab the latest Linaro binary toolchains, then it's probably best to ask somebody from the Linaro Toolchain Working Group. I've added Ryan Arnold to cc, since he should be able to help. Ryan: the background is that the Make.cross script [1] hardcodes a path to a Linaro binary toolchain that no longer exists, so it would be good to replace it with a stable link pointing to the latest build. Is the one suggested above correct? Will [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYOoq-4Za-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557401 |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:00:07PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: >Hi Fengguang, Masami, > >On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:31:57AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:08:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> >BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. >> >So I made a patch for that. >> >> So there are gcc 4.9, 5, 6 versions available for aarch64. Since the >> build robot nowadays uses debian's packaged gcc-6-aarch64-linux-gnu, >> it should be better to use gcc-6 in make.coss to better reproduce >> reported regressions: >> >> http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest/aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-linaro-6.2.1-2016.11-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz >> >> There are some other files there and I'm not quite sure if that's the >> right URL to use. CC aarch64 maintainers for possible inputs. > >If you're looking for a stable url to grab the latest Linaro binary Yes it'd be best to have a stable URL. Thanks! >toolchains, then it's probably best to ask somebody from the Linaro >Toolchain Working Group. I've added Ryan Arnold to cc, since he should >be able to help. > >Ryan: the background is that the Make.cross script [1] hardcodes a path >to a Linaro binary toolchain that no longer exists, so it would be good >to replace it with a stable link pointing to the latest build. Is the one >suggested above correct? > >Will > >[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-13 04:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZ0IV-49E-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557089 |
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:31:57 +0800 Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Masami, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:08:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >Ping? > > Oops, sorry for overlooking your previous email! > > >BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. > >So I made a patch for that. > > So there are gcc 4.9, 5, 6 versions available for aarch64. Since the > build robot nowadays uses debian's packaged gcc-6-aarch64-linux-gnu, > it should be better to use gcc-6 in make.coss to better reproduce > reported regressions: OK, that'll be good too. Would it use debian cross-arch gcc for other architectures too? I would like to make similar environment for build test internally. Thank you, > > http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest/aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-linaro-6.2.1-2016.11-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > There are some other files there and I'm not quite sure if that's the > right URL to use. CC aarch64 maintainers for possible inputs. > > Thanks, > Fengguang > > >On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:43:45 +0900 > >Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi Fengguang, > >> > >> Recently I tried to build a cross-build environment ( https://github.com/mhiramat/linux-cross ) by using your make.cross ( https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross ). > >> And I've found that it failed to setup cross gcc for aarch64, because it is no more provided by linaro. > >> > >> Could you update the url to the newer one from linaro or use crosstool > >> as like as other archs? > >> > >> The latest stable version (gcc-5) can be found here. > >> http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/latest-5/ > >> > >> There are also gcc-6 series for development, and you can find 4.9 binaries > >> too. But I would like to recommend you to use stable one for testing. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> -- > >> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > > > > >-- > >Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYEp4-7eK-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1556356 |
>BTW, I found that the old toolchain is archived in release.linaro.org. >So I made a patch for that. Applied the patch, thank you! Regards, Fengguang
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web