Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1556998 > unrolled thread

Re: edac/i7300_edac.c:307: strange macro ?

Started byBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
First post2017-01-12 00:00 +0100
Last post2017-01-12 00:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: edac/i7300_edac.c:307: strange macro ? Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-01-12 00:00 +0100

#1556998 — Re: edac/i7300_edac.c:307: strange macro ?

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2017-01-12 00:00 +0100
SubjectRe: edac/i7300_edac.c:307: strange macro ?
Message-ID<sYA25-4n7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:48:51PM +0000, David Binderman wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c:307:32: warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead [-Wint-in-bool-context]

Are you adding some other -W-switches to the kernel Makefile?

:-)

> Source code is
> 
>   #define IS_SECOND_CH(v)   ((v) * (1 << 17))

Looks like a bug to me. According to the chipset doc, bit 17 in REDMEMB
is the locator bit for CS[3:2] which probably means the second channel
but multiplying the full register value with 131072 looks wrong.

> Maybe better code
> 
>   #define IS_SECOND_CH(v)   ((v) & (1 << 17))

Yap.

Mauro, what's up?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web